Advanced Search Results

Mohammed Farooq Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1986(2)Crimes571; 29(1986)DLT468; 1986(11)DRJ44; 1989(39)ELT192(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Padmanabhan

Malik Sharief-Ud-Din, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by one Shri Mohd. Farooq, son of the detenu - Smt. Jaithoon Beevi, challenging the validity of the detention order...

V. Rajammal Vs. P. Jesudhas and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 34, Rules 10 and 11

Reported in : AIR1977Mad53

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Padmanabhan

ORDER1. These two C. R. Ps. can be dealt with together. The short facts are as follows:--In O. S. No. 47 of 1970 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil, the appellant herein obtained a...

Subba Reddiar Vs. Hazra Bibi

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2 - Order 20, Rules 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 18

Reported in : AIR1973Mad237

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Padmanabhan, Mr. S. Padmanabhan

1. This appeal arises out of the final decree proceedings in a partition action. O. S. No. 138 of 1949 in which the appellant-fifth defendant has been held liable for mesne profits in respect of a...

K. Daniel Nadar and ors. Vs. R. Ananthan Pillai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1978)1MLJ125

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Padmanabhan

A.Varadarajan, J.1. The legal representatives of the plaintiff K. Daniel Nadar, who failed in both the Courts below are the appellants. Daniel Nadar filed the suit for partition and separate possession of 2 acres of land...

R. Venugopala Naidu and Others Vs. Venkatarayulu Naidu Charities and O ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 92 - Order, Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1990SC444a; [1989]Supp1SCR760

Advocate for Appellant : S. Padmanabhan,; T.A. Subramaniyam,; R.N. Keshwani and;

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. Venkatarayulu Naidu Charities is a public trust V.P. Venkatakrishna Naidu and V.P. Rajagopala Naidu, filed an original suit No. 28 of 1909 (hereinafter called original suit) in the court of Subordinate Judge, Mayavaram...

Parakunnan Veetill Joseph's Son Mathew Vs. Nedumbara Kuruvila's Son an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1987SC2328; JT1987(3)SC643; 1988(1)KLT7(SC); 1987(2)SCALE588; 1987Supp(1)SCC340; 1987(2)LC449(SC); MANU/SC/0173/1987

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Padmanabhan

1. This appeal, by Special Leave concerns the validity for a decree for specific performance granted by the High Court of Kerala in A.S. No. 525/1971.2. 'Kadalat Estate', which was the subject matter of a suit...

R. Venugopala Naidu and ors. Vs. Venkatarayulu Naidu Charities and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 92 and 92(1) - Order I, Rule 8;

Reported in : AIR1990SC444; JT1989(4)SC262; 1989(2)SCALE902; 1989Supp(2)SCC356

Advocate for Appellant : S. Padmanabhan Sr. Adv.; T. A Subramaniyam; R.N. Keshwani an; S. Balakrishnan Advs

Kuldip Singh, J.1. Venkatarayulu Naidu Charities is a public trust.' V.P. Venkatakrishna Naidu and V.P. Rajagopala Naidu, filed an original suit No. 28 of 1909 (hereinafter called original suit) in the court of Subordinate. Judge, Mayavaram...

V.K. Abraham Vs. N.K. Abraham

Court : Chennai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 1; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1978Mad56

Advocate for Appellant : S. Padmanabhan, Adv.

1. The defendant in O. S. No. 91 of 19VO in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Padmanabhapuram, is the appellant. The plaintiff is a rubber dealer in Kulasekharam. The defendant is the owner of a...

G. Arumugam and Anjalai Vs. R. Krishnamurthy and the New India Assuran ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehciles Act - Sections 163 and 163A

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC36; (2007)1MLJ866

Advocate for Appellant : Varada Kamaraj Adv. for ;B.S. Padmanabhan, Adv.

V. Dhanapalan, J.1. Challenging the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, V Court of Small Causes, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') made in M.C.O.P. No. 639 of 1995 dated 28.04.1997 for a sum...

S. Sankararamakrishnan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ475

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G. Vasantha Pai, Mr. S. Padmanabhan

ORDERM. M. Ismail, J.1. The petitioners in these writ petitions are two Advocates of this Court and the common respondents are the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary to Government, Education Department, Fort St....