Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s p roy and · Page 1 of about 312 results (0.283 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 09 2004

Dulal Chandra Chatterjee and ors. Vs. Moni Mohan Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-09-2004

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesFamily

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5, 6, 10, 122, 123, 126 and 197; ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 2(24); ;Indian Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 5 and 6; ;Partition Act; ;Religious and Charitable Endowment Act; ;Hindu Sucession Act, 1956; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 16(3)

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN563

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy Chowdhury, ;Mrinal Kanti Roy and ;Kapil Chandra Sahoo, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. This appeal arises out of a judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Fifth Court at Alipore on June 12, 1978 in Title Suit No. 54 of 1974.1.2. This suit was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2001

Khargeswar Choudhury and anr. Vs. Isfaque HussaIn and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227 - Order 9, Rule 13

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.P. Roy and Mr. C. Baruah, Advs.

1. The factual matrix of this case depicts the callousness and lacklustre attitude on the part of a lawyer conducting in a case. A time has come when some authority must step in and take an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1996

Smt. Madhabi Dey and ors. Vs. Basudeb Bakuli and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-30-1996

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 and 115A - Order 21, Rule 97; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (1997)1CALLT290(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy Chowdhury, ;Subhra Kamal Mukherjee, ;Debasish Roy and ;Rabindra Nath Mahato, Advs.

Nripendra Kumar Bhattacharyya, J. 1. Heard the submission of the learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S.P. Roy Chowdhury being assisted by the learned Advocates Mr. Subhra Kamal Mukherjee, Mr. Debasis Roy and Mr. Rabindra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 30 2008

Pratik Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pratap Properties Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-30-2008

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act; ;Contempt of Courts Rules - Rules 4 and 17; ;Specific Relief Act - Sections 14(3)(C) and 42; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 144; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2008)3CALLT372(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Mitra, ;Joydip Kar, ;Aniruddha Chatterjee, ;A.K. Ghosh and ;Prabir Banerjee, Advs. in C.P.A.N. 1103 and 1265 of 2006 and C.A.N. 6267 of 2006 and ;S.P. Roy Chowdhury, ;Ashok Banerjee, ;J.L. Be, ;S

Pranab Kumar Deb, J.1. The dispute has a long chequered history. Genesis of the dispute between the land owner and the developer can be traced back to the mid eighties. M/s. Pratap Properties Ltd., being the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2008

inland Manufacturing Company Vs. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kol ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-23-2008

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 - Section 5; ;Rent Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 227

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy Chowdhury, ;Shyamal Sarkar, ;Debasish Roy and ;Vinay Kumar Jain, Advs.

S.P. Talukdar, J.1. The petitioner, Inland Manufacturing Company, by filing an application under Article 227 of the Constitution being C.O. No. 4477 of 2005 sought to assail the judgment dated 30th September, 2005 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2001

Khargeswar Choudhury and anr. Vs. Isfaque HussaIn and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227 - Order 9, Rule 13

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.P. Roy and ;Mr. C. Baruah, Advs.

1. The factual matrix of this case depicts the callousness and lacklustre attitude on the part of a lawyer conducting in a case. A time has come when some authority must step in and take an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2004

Raghunath Choudhury and ors. Vs. Rameshwar Rai and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Dec-10-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115, 115(1) and 151 - Orders 38, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy and N. Alam, Advs.

H.N. Sarma, J. 1. By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the order, dated 12.2.2003 passed in Misc (J) Case No. 1/03 arising out of Title Suit No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2004

V.N. Enterprise and anr. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-31-2004

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 25 and 25(3)

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy, C. Baruah, K. Rajbanshi and B.R. Das, Advs.

D. Biswas, J.1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated . 16.2.2001 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) No. 2, Kamrup, Guwhati dismissing the Money Suit No 131 of 1997.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 1987

Bholanath Karmakar and ors. Vs. Madanmohan Karmakar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-30-1987

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 136 and 182; ;Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(15) and 35; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rules 6A and 7; ;Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR1988Cal1,(1988)1CALLT1(HC),92CWN428

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy Chowdhury, ;Kamal Krishna Chakraborty, ;Amit Kumar Rakshit and ;P.B. Das, Advs.

A.M. Bhattacharjee, J.1. The question involved in this revisional application referred to this Special Bench is when a final decree for partition becomes enforceable within the meaning of Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 so...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1981

Jogesh Chandra Bera and ors. Vs. Sri Iswar Braja Raj Jew Thakur

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-28-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 33, Rule 1; ;Hindu Law; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3 (42)

Reported in : AIR1981Cal259,85CWN849

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy Chowdhury and ;Probhat Kumar Samanta, Advs.

B.C. Chakrabarti, J.1. This is a revision application at the instance of some of the defendants in a proceeding arising out of an application for leave to sue as indigent person being Judicial Misc. Case No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial