Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s p kshirsagar · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 30 2004

Madhao S/O Somaji Sarode Vs. Jotiba Dhyan Upasak Shikshan Sanstha and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-30-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1978 - Sections 9(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 9 and 9(1)

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR684; 2004(3)MhLj1078

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Chandurkar and ;B.H. Shambharkar, Advs.

B.R. Gavai, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Shri S. P. Kshirsagar; learned Counsel waives notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Shri D. P. Thakre, learned Assistant Government Pleader...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2014

Vinayak S/O. Daulat Watkar (Dead) Through L.Rs.: and Others Vs. Jeevan ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jan-27-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: 1. This Second Appeal impugns Judgement and Order dated 10-07-2002 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.601 of 1997 decided by 2nd Additional District Judge, Nagpur. The Second Appeal was admitted on 29-09-2003 on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2015

Ashok Kundalrai Mohekar Vs. The National Textile Corporation Ltd. (M. ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Mar-12-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: 1. The petitioner-original plaintiff has filed the present writ petition being aggrieved by the order dated 02.04.2013 passed by the first appellate Court allowing the appeal filed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 16 2015

Vitthal and Others Vs. Shrikisan and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This Second Appeal was admitted on 27.7.2007 on the following substantial questions of law: (a) Whether the plaintiff was entitled to institute the instant suit when the earlier suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2015

Rajendra Namdeorao Akre Vs. Rajkumar Bhalerao Balbudhe and Another

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jun-30-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: 1. Shri H.S. Chitaley, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states on instructions that respondent No.2 has filed a pursis before the Appellate Court stating that she does not desire to contest the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2002

Nagorao Alias Arun S/O Narayan Yerawar, Vs. Narayan S/O Nagan Yerawar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-29-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 104, 115, 115(1) and 115(2) - Order 39, Rules 1 to 6 - Order 41, Rule 1 - Order 43, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999

Reported in : AIR2003Bom178; 2003(2)BomCR148; 2002(4)MhLj615

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Gorday, Adv.

V.G. Palshikar, J.1. This revision application is directed againstthe order passed in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 6/95 passed on6-8-1996 below (Exh.114) in Regular Civil Suit No. 56/92whereby the order of status-quo was granted. The learnedappellate Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2006

Sukhdeo Ambuji Bahakar and ors. Vs. Savita Gajanan Kalne

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR515; 2006(4)MhLj384

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Deshpande, Adv.

ORDERA.H. Joshi, J.1. Heard Advocate Mr. V.M. Deshpande for the appellants and Advocate Mr. S.P. Kshirsagar with Advocate Mr. S.D. Khati for the respondent.2. In support of the appeal, learned Advocate Mr. Deshpande has pressed two...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2008

Bhujang Nathuji Daf and anr. Vs. Ramkrishna Daulat Daf and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-14-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 137; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 18, Rule 2 and 2(2)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR165

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv.

Dharmadhikari, B.P., J.1. Heard Advocate Shri Kshirsagar for petitioner and Advocate Shri Patwardhan for respondents.2. The plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 777/1997 (re-registered as Regular Civil Suit No. 269/2001 before Civil Judge, Junior Division, Saoner)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2005

Anant Balaji Todkar and ors. Vs. Smt. Vijaya Ramkrishna Girde and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-31-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 3 and 5; Madras General Sales Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 - Order 21, Rules 35, 36, 97, 99, 101, 103 and 104 - Order 22, Rule 5; Constitution of India - Article 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR880; 2005(4)MhLj90

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Purohit, Adv. in W.P. No. 4277 of 2004 and W.P. No. (Stamp) 28701 of 2004 and ;S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv. in W.P. No. 87 of 2005

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Writ Petition 4277 of 2004 is filed by decree holders Ananta and others against the respondent Vijaya and her husband Ramakrishna challenging the order dated 23-7-2004 passed by 15th Ad-hoc Additional District Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2007

Radhabai W/O Laxmanrao Ghate Vs. Dattatraya S/O Raghunath Jog

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-2007

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Debt Relief Act, 1975; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 136; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 11(2)

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR130; 2008(3)MhLj374

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv.

C.L. Pangarkar, J.1. This review application has been filed against the judgment delivered in Civil Revision Application No. 115 of 2006 by this Court. The parties hereinafter shall be referred to as decree-holder and judgment-debtor.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial