Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s p kanuga · Page 1 of about 38 results (0.039 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 06 1998

Sardar Inder Singh Jawar Singh Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR897

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kanuga

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. Heard Shri S.P. Kanuga, for the petitioner, No one appears for the respondent, though they are duly served. The only short point which is canvassed in this civil application which is pending for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2006

Smt. Shalini Laxman Wadnerkar Vs. Bank of Baroda Employees Co-operativ ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR410; 2006(5)BomCR292; 2006(3)MhLj828

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kanuga, Adv.

K.J. Rohee, J.1. The appellant is the only surviving legal representative of the deceased plaintiff as his daughter. She has preferred appeal against the common judgment delivered by the Additional Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Bombay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1992

Devandas Kishnani and Others Vs. Nanikram Kishnani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-28-1992

Subject : LimitationArbitration

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 119 - Sections 5 and 12(2); Arbitration Act, 1872 - Sections 13 and 14(2); Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 158

Reported in : AIR1993Bom76; 1992(3)BomCR1; (1994)94BOMLR904

Advocate for Appellant : R. Srinivasan, ;N.G. Thakkar, ;N.H. Gursakani and ;M.P.S. Rao, Advs. i/b. ;Malvi Ranchoddas & Co. and ;M/s. Nanu Hosmusjee & Co.

1. Shri Prem Devandas Kishnani (Petitioner/Claimant No. 8) and Smt. Neeru Prem Kishnani (Petitioner/ Claimant No. 19) (hereinafter referred to as the petitioners) have challenged the impugned Award dated 10th March, 1990 as modified by Supplemental...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 11 2003

Faze Three Exports Ltd. Vs. Pankaj Trading Co. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-11-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 24, 31(8) and 34

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR685; 2004(2)ARBLR163(Bom); 2004(2)BomCR522; 2004(2)MhLj196

Advocate for Appellant : D.H. Mehta, Adv. i/b. ;Mahimkar and Mahimkar and Co.

D.G. Karnik, J.P.C.1. Admit. Mr. S. P. Kanuga appears for respondent No. 1 and waives service. Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are arbitrators and are formal parties. Notice to them is dispensed with. By consent,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1979

Manohar Narayan Joshi and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-23-1979

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 5, 5(1), 5(2) and 27; Factories Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1980)ILLJ230Bom

Pratap, J.1. In this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners challenge the validity of a Notification dated 15th November, 1974 (Exhibit J to the petition) issued by the State Government by virtue of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2001

Kishore K. Shahani and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-08-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 32A - Schedule I - Article 25; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD, 269UL and 276

Reported in : AIR2001Bom351; 2001(4)ALLMR298; 2001(4)BomCR469; (2001)3BOMLR745; 2001(3)MhLj724

Advocate for Appellant : Shri S.P. Kanuga, Adv.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioners are challenging the legality and validity of the order requiring the petitioners to pay stamp duty at the rate prevailing on 9.9.1992 instead of rate prevailing on 30th May, 1997 on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1993

Shaikh Dawood Shaikh Biban Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-01-1993

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 412(1) and 412(2)

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR695

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kanuga, Adv.

A.V. Savant, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the action of seizure of 193 live goats made by the respondents from the petitioner on 5th November, 1988 on the ground that the seizure and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1994

Arjundas S/O Narayandas Panjwani and ors. Vs. Vera Mishra of Bombay an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-26-1994

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263 and 283

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR497

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kanuga and ;B.J. Mulchandani, Advs.

N.D. Vyas, J.1. This is a petition filed for revocation of grant made by this Court in respect of Item 83 pertaining to an immovable property situate at Katni, Tehsil Murwara, District Jabalpur, M.P. This item...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1967

Narayandas S. Kanuga Vs. Sarasvatibai D. Joshi and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-1967

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 54 and 58

Reported in : AIR1968Bom280; (1967)69BOMLR622; 1967MhLJ946

Advocate for Appellant : H.G. Advani and ;S.P. Kanuga, Advs.

(1) There is a rectangular plot of land abutted on two sides by road-on the south by B. J. Road and on the east Gram Panchayat Road. It measures 1895 Sq. Yards. Small plots of land,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2009

Sailash Amulakh Jogani of Gujarat, Indian Inhabitant and Pankaj K. Jog ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-23-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 107, 112, 123, 123(2), 125, 167(8), 178A(1) and 178A(2); Evidence Act - Sections 24, 106 and 114; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 178A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 8(3), 9(1) and 71(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 320

Reported in : 2009(241)ELT348(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kanuga and ;Nisha Valani, Advs.

Ranjana Desai, J.1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of Order dated 3/12/1992 passed by respondent 5 i.e. the Collector of Customs (Preventive),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial