Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s p jain · Page 1 of about 451 results (0.430 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 2003

Harcharan Singh Brar Vs. Sukhdarshan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-11-2003

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 83(1), 86(5) and 123(7); Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 94A

Reported in : (2004)137PLR757

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Jain, Sr. Adv.,; M.L. Saggar and; Vijay Kumar Choud

S.S. Nijjar, J.1. The elections to the Punjab Legislative Assembly were held on 7.2.1997. The term of five years was to expire on 14.2.2002. The Election Commission of India announced the Election Programme for the States...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2001

S.A. JaIn College Trust and Managing Society Vs. the State of Haryana ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-28-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : East Punjab Evacuees (Administration of Property) Act, 1947 - Sections 5A; East Punjab Displaced Persons (Land Resettlement) Act, 1949 - Sections 9; Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 40; Punjab Alienation of Land Act, 1960 - Sections 11

Reported in : (2004)136PLR287

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Jain, Sr. Adv. and; Vijay Kumar Chaudhary, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This appeal under Clause x of the Letters Patent is directed against judgment dated 25.10.1985 rendered by the learned Single Judge in RFA No. 390 of 1975 vide which the learned Single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1999

Raj Kumar and Etc. Vs. Union Territory and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-29-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 8A; Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Building Rules, 1973 - Rules 12, 12(3) and 21A; Constiution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1999P& H197; (1999)122PLR332

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Jain, Sr. Adv.,; Rajesh Gumer and; Chetan Mittal

G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. The petitioners have prayed for quashing the orders passed by the Assistant Estate Officer, the Chief Administrator and the Adviser to the Administrator, Union Territory, Chandigarh under the Capital of Punjab (Development...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 03 2008

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Neelam Deshwar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-03-2008

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168 and 171; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 203

Reported in : 2009ACJ1

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Jain and; S.N. Parashar, Advs

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. The appellant D.T.C. feeling aggrieved with the award dated 2.1.2004 passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal has preferred the present appeals, viz., M.A.C. Appeal Nos. 277, 279 and 283 of 2004. Since the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2001

Rakesh Kalia Vs. Ito

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)71TTJ(Del)438

Advocate for Appellant : R. Santhanam,for the assessed; S.P. Jain, for the Revenu

ORDERV. Dongzathang, P.These appeals of the assessed are directed against the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) on quantum as well as on penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1992-93.2. The assessed in this case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 1991

Smt. Kartari Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-10-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 27; Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : [1992]197ITR140(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Jain, Adv.

S.S. Sodhi, J.1. The matter here pertains to the assessment of wealth-tax for the years 1974-75 and 1975-76.2. On May 15, 1975, a decree for declaration was passed against the assessee, Smt. Kartari whereby, her sons...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 1995

Pawan Kumar S/O Jagdish Ram Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-10-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Haryana Affiliated College (Security of Service) Rules, 1980 - Rule 3 and 3(1)

Reported in : (1995)110PLR506

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Jain and; Rajesh Gumber, Advs.

ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J.1. The petitioner joined service on his appointment as Lab. Assistant on 30.7.1980 in Hindu Girls College, Sonepat, which is being managed by respondent No. 2. He was confirmed in service in the year...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1999

Kiran House and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-10-1999

Subject : Service TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 246 and 366

Reported in : (1999)122PLR695

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Jain, Sr. Adv. and; Chetan Mittal, Adv.

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The petitioners complaint that the show cause notices issued to them (which are in similar terms) regarding the levy of service tax are illegal. They pray that the notices be quashed.2. We...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1998

Mahant Ram Parkash Dass Vs. Ramesh Chander and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-16-1998

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 100; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 63

Reported in : AIR1998P& H146

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Jain, Sr. Adv. and; Rajesh Gumber, Adv.

ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The petitioner questions the election of Mr. Ramesh Chander to the Punjab Legislature from the Dasuya Assembly Constituency. He prays that the election be annulled and that he be declared to have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1991

Sunder Dass and anr. Vs. Avinash Chander Sood

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-12-1991

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(3) and 15(5)

Reported in : (1992)101PLR220

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Jain, Adv.

G.C. Garg, J.1. This is a tenants' revision petition against the order of ejectment passed against them from the shop in question on the ground that the building has become unfit and unsafe for human habitation.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial