Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Subhash Trading Co.
Gujarat
Nov-08-1995
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1)
(1996)131CTR(Guj)121; [1996]221ITR110(Guj)
B.J. Shelat, Adv. for M.R. Bhatt & Co.
R. Balia, J.1. In compliance with the directions issued by this Court in IT Ref. No. 102 of 1981 decided on 30th April, 1981, the Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'B' had submitted statement of case and referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKantilal Manilal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-ii
Gujarat
Mar-01-1980
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68, 69A, 143, 144, 145(2), 147, 271(1) and 274
(1980)18CTR(Guj)378; [1981]130ITR411(Guj)
P.D. Desai, J.1. The assessee, a partnership firm, was a dealer in medicines. It return of income for the assessment year 1969-70, the previous year being S. Y. 2024, was filed on May 12, 1969. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Gujarat
Oct-09-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)164CTR(Guj)209
R. K. . Patel, for the Assessee B . B. Naik for M.R. Bhatt & Co., for the Revenue
D. M. Dharmadhikari, C. J.At the instance of the assessee, out of many questions proposed, only the following questions have been referred under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act.'1. Whether on the facts and in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prabhat Oil Traders Vs. Income-tax Officer (No. 3)
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Sep-21-1995
Direct Taxation
1. This appeal has come before me for my opinion as a Third Member, under Section 255(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as there was a difference of opinion on the following point between the Members...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVishwakarma Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-12-1982
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1964 - Sections 271(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1); Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 28(1)
[1982]135ITR652(P& H)
Ashok Bhan and; Ajay Mittal, Advs.
S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J. 1. The true legislative intent in adding the Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act by the Finance Act, No. 5 of 1964, as also the nature and scope thereof is the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askimperial Box and Carton Makers Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jun-07-1984
Direct Taxation
(1985)11ITD551(Delhi)
1. This is an appeal pertaining to the assessment year 1975-76. The assessee, a registered firm, manufactures and sells boxes and cartons.The previous year for the assessment year 1975-76 ended on 31-3-1975.For the year under consideration,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincome-tax Officer Vs. Belliss and Morcom
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
May-08-1985
Direct Taxation
(1985)14ITD361(Kol.)
1. This is a departmental appeal challenging the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) deleting the imposition of penalty by the ITO amounting to Rs. 24,183 in terms of Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincome-tax Officer Vs. Ghanshyam A. Pandit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Feb-25-1987
Direct Taxation
(1987)22ITD140(Ahd.)
1. The revenue in this appeal is agitated with the cancellation of the penalty imposed by the ITO under the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. At the time of the hearing of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHasmukhlal Ambaram Jariwala Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Oct-29-1993
Direct Taxation
(1994)49ITD171(Ahd.)
1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT (Appeals), Surat confirming penalty of Rs. 70,000 under Section 271(l)(c).2. The assessee, an individual, derived share income from two registered firms, viz.,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRipudaman Singal Vs. Income Tax Officer.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Apr-26-1995
Direct Taxation
(1996)55TTJ(Chd.)396
These are two appeals by two assessees, with identical names, relating to asst. yr. 1988-89. Since the issues involved are common and both the assessees are sister concerns, these appeals are being decided by this consolidated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »