Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s obul reddi · Page 1 of about 100 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 12 2026

Union of India Vs M/s.Obul Reddy Constructions,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-12-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 12-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU1. Union of India Rep. by General Manager, Park Town, Chennai -32. Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination)Tiruchirapalli Division, Trichy - 621 001. ..Applicant(s) Vs M/s.Obul...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1954

In Re: Valluru Narayana Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-21-1954

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 346, 346(2) and 437; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307

Reported in : AIR1955AP48; 1955CriLJ383

Advocate for Appellant : S. Obul Reddi, Adv. for ;P. Basi Reddy and ;P.S. Ramachandra Reddy, Advs.

ORDER(1) This is a petition is revision against the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Cuddappah, who, while acting under S. 346(2), Criminal P. C., decided to proceed with the case as a preliminary register case. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1949

Desayi Chelapathi Reddi Vs. the Provincial Government of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-04-1949

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 - Sections 136D, 139, 142, 142(1) and 142(3); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 69 and 70

Reported in : AIR1951Mad650

Advocate for Appellant : T. Venkatadri and ;S. Obul Reddi, Advs.

Raghava Rao, J. 1. This second appeal arises out of a suit instituted by the plaintiff, the appellant here as well as in the lower appellate Court, for a declaration that the Provincial Government had no...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 27 1954

In Re: Mr. Hayles, Editor of The Mail and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-27-1954

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 215 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7; High Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 15; Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 - Sections 30 and 30(1); Contempt of Courts Act, 1962 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1955Mad1; 1955CriLJ1

Advocate for Appellant : A.C. Muthanna, Adv. for Hayles, ;K. Bhashyam, ;R. Srinivasan and ;S. Obul Reddi, Advs. for Govind Swaminathan, Adv., ;Adv.-General and ;Public Prosecutor as amucus curiae

Mack J. 1. As Special Industrial Tribunal appointed by the Government of Madras, I adjudicated, while a sitting Judge of this Court, the disputes between the managements and workers of malgamation Ltd. Madras, in their eleven...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1951

In Re: Mottai thevar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-06-1951

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154, 162, 172 and 172(2); Madras Borstal Schools Act - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR1952Mad586; (1951)2MLJ605

Advocate for Appellant : S. Obul Reddi, Adv.

Mack, J.1. Appellant, a young man aged 20, has been found guilty under Section 302, I. P. C. and sentenced to death by the learned Sessions Judge of Coimbatore for the murder of one Muthuswami Goundan,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1980

Kores (India) Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-17-1980

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1982(10)ELT253(Bom)

1. This Special Civil Application raises two interesting points of considerable importance, viz., (1) Whether any excise duty is at all leviable on teleprinter rolls made by the petitioners, and (2) Assuming that such excise duty...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1984

C. Arunachalam Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-26-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64, 64(1) and 263

Reported in : ILR1984KAR1387; [1985]151ITR172(KAR); [1985]151ITR172(Karn); 1986(1)KarLJ150

Advocate for Appellant : K.R. Prasad and ;S.P. Bhat, Advs.

Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. The questions referred in these I.T.R.Cs. relate to the scope of s. 64(1)(i) and (ii) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (called shortly 'the Act'). I.T.R.Cs. Nos. 89 and 90 of 1976 are at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 1998

All India Regional Rural Banks Employees' Association, Bernampur, Dist ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-11-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 18(3), 19(3 and 6) and 33-C; Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - Sections 3(2), 17, 24, 29 and 30 - Rule 17; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 39 and 226

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1064; 2000(3)KarLJ157

Advocate for Appellant : Sri P.S. Rajagopal, Adv.

ORDER1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing the report dated 17th May, 1997 submitted by 5th respondent on salaries, allowances of employees of Regional Rural Banks...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2000

J. Satyappa Vs. Tungabhadra GramIn Bank, Bellary

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-07-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Regional and Rural Banks Act, 1976 - Sections 30; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(6)KarLJ607

Advocate for Appellant : Sri P.S. Rajagopal, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is an employee of the respondent-Bank which is a Rural Gramin Bank sponsored by the Canara Bank. He is before this Court questioning the correctness of the order passed by the respondent dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1989

Southern Steel Ltd. Hyderabad Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-28-1989

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 49 and 49(1); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 141 and 226; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1990AP58

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Murty, ;V. Venkataramana, ;K.V. Subahmanya Narsu, ;B.V. Subbaiah, ;E.S.R. Murthy, ;G. Sarangan, ;G. Krishna Murty, ;K. Ragha Rao, ;M. Koka Satyanarayana Rao, ;Y. Vasudrvarao, ;Duba Mohan Rao,

ORDERJeevan Reddy, J. 1. Condition 28 of the terms and conditions notified by the A.P. Slate Electricity Board under Section 49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') provides that every...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial