Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s n vimadalal · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.057 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 17 2003

Mamta Kulkarni Vs. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-17-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 292, 397, 401 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 200 and 204; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(2)MhLj179

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Vimadalal, Adv.

J.G. Chitra, J.1. Heard Shri Vimadalal for the petitioner (original accused) in prosecution pending before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 9th Court Mumbai, bearing CC No. 49/S of 1995 and Shri Saste for respondent Nos. 1 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1996

Ravindra Anant Deshmukh Vs. City and Industrial Development Corporatio ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-24-1996

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1997Bom284; 1997(1)BomCR274; 1996(2)MhLj847

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Vimadalal and ;Ms. Manju Hirani, Advs, i/by ;M/s. Vimadalal & Co.

ORDERDr. B. P. Saraf, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learned single Judge dated 8th June, 1993 dismissing the suit of the appellant field under Section 20 of the Arbtiration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1992

Jayshree Raghuvir Balgi Vs. Gokuldas Sheshgiri Prabhu

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1992

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 218; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR230

Advocate for Appellant : Sarookh Kathawala and ;S.N. Vimadalal, Advs. instructed by Vimadalal & Co.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. The material facts having bearing on the preliminary issues framed by the Court regarding locus standi of the Caveator to file the Caveat herein are as under :(a) On 30th June, 1983, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 24 2005

Zaveed Pharukhi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-24-2005

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 7, 10, 17 and 19; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR106; 2005(4)BomCR244; 2005(2)MhLj1061

Advocate for Appellant : Madhavi Diwan, Amicus Curie;Riyz I. Chagla and ;S.N. Vimadalal, Advs., i/b., Vimadalal and Co.

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. This is an Appeal against the order of the learned single Judge dated 30th November, 2004, dismissing the appellants' Petition. The appellants have filed the Petition for an order declaring appellant Nos. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1992

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. M.S. Builders (Private) Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 2(9); Bombay Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1985; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2 - Order 23, Rule 1

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR568

Advocate for Appellant : P.D. Anklesaria, Adv., ;L.C. Chogle, Govt. Pld. for appellants in A. Nos. 238, 224, 275 and 551, 1031/1991, ;A.R. Kini, Adv. in A. Nos. 275 and 551 of 1991, ;S.T. Tijoriwala and ;S.N. Vimadalal, Advs

S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. These two appeals and other connected matters which were heard together raise common question of law under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. We heard advocates for parties in all these matters and we...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2004

In Re: Appointment of Guardians for the New Born Male Child (Now Known ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2004

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 7, 17, 19, 19(1) and 50; Guardians and Wards Rules - Rule 321 and 321(2)

Reported in : 2005(2)BomCR655; 2005(1)MhLj924

Advocate for Appellant : R.I. Chagla and ; S.N. Vimadalal, Advs., i/b., Vimadalal & Co.

S.U. Kamdar, J.1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 seeks relief that they should be declared as guardians of the wards viz. Faraz (formerly known as Sohail). The Petitioner Nos. 3 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 1992

V.M. Bhandari Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-14-1992

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1992(2)BomCR58

Advocate for Appellant : J.I. Mehta, ; S.N. Vimadalal ; and N.V. Adhiya, Advs.

K. Sukumaran, J.1. A public grievance is sought to be ventilated in this writ petition. It concerns the allotment of the Cross Maidan of Bombay for the conduct of an exhibition , to Adivasi Seva Samiti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial