Advanced Search Results

Vithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 25, 25(1), (2), (2A), (2B), (3), (4), (5) and (6),29(1), 31, 31(2), 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 50, 53(1), 53(2), 132, 133, 226, 277, 245, 246, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 301, 352, 354, 355, 357, 358, 359(1), 359(1-A), 360, 367, 368 and 394; Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act; Constitution (Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1972; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2-A, 2(5), 22(5), 2(9), 2(21), 2(30), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(14), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 4(1), 11, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 16, 16(3), 17, 17(1), 18, 21, 21-A(1), 21(4), 23, 27, 28

Reported in : AIR1977Bom99

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Hajarnavis, S.R. Deshpande, S.N. Kherdekar, J.N. Chandurkar, B.R. Mandlekar, R.N. Deshpande, V.L. Mohta, R.N. Pendharkar, V.R. Manohar, V.S. Sohoni, R.M. Joharapurkar, B.P. Jaiswal, M.S. Choudhar

Masodkar, J. 1. These 2661 cases have clogged the Court's corridors for considerable time, challenging the provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (Act No. 27 of 1961) as amended by the...

Watsalabai and ors. Vs. Babutai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 133(1); Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : AIR1976Bom58; 1975MhLJ561

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kherdekar, Adv.

Lalit, J. 1. One Wamanrao Ingle was possessed of considerable property, He filed Special Civil Suit No. 6-A of 1958 in the Court of the Civil Judge. Senior Division Amravati. This suit was mainly for a...

Nirmalabai and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 3(2), 10(1) and 491

Reported in : AIR1985Bom260

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kherdekar, Adv.

ORDER1. The judgments in this writ petition and some other writ petitions were kept reserved to await the decision of the Division Bench of this Court on a reference made by the learned single Judge of...

Anant Vishnu Khare Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR371

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. R. Bobde

Tambe, J.1. Petitioners Anant Vishnu Khare and Ramchandra Brijlal have filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India wherein they pray for issuance of a writ of certiorari or such other...

Govinda Zibla Doye Vs. Udhao Dharmaji Nikhade and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Laws; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidharbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 21(1), 36(1), 43(14-A) and 50

Reported in : AIR1972Bom169; ILR1972Bom1000; 1972MhLJ588

Advocate for Appellant : B.R. Mandlekar, Adv.;S.N. Khardekar and ;R.N. Deshpande, Advs.

ORDER1. This judgment shall govern Special Civil Applications Nos. 2 and 3 of 1970. The questions involved in these petitions relate to the construction of Section 50 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands ( Vidharbha...

Kisan Punjaji Vs. Yashodabai Mahadeo

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1968)70BOMLR765; 1968MhLJ688

Deshmukh, J.1. This is a writ petition by one Kisan who is the defendant in a pending suit and who claims to be a tenant of survey No. 129/1 of mouza Akot. On his pleading in...

Ramrao S/O. Punjaji Deshmukh Vs. Mugutrao S/O. Anandrao Deshmukh

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR410

Waikar, J.1. This revision application is filed by the original defendant against the order passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Amravati, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 138 of 1977 remanding the matter to the trial Court...

Sakharam Narayan Kherdekar Vs. City of Nagpur Corporation and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1939; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(7), 2(8), 2(24), 2(25), 2(27), 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 26, 27, 32, 34, 39, 40, 41, 42, 52, 56 and 65; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Legal Practitioners Act; Advocates Act, 1961; Bombay Shops and Establishments Rules, 1948 - Rule 5; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 38-A, 39 and 42-A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 22; Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act, 1961; Buildings Societies Act, 1884; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Central Provinces and Berar Goondas Act; Punjab Shops and Establishments Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 73; Extension and Amendment Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1964Bom200; (1963)65BOMLR627; ILR1963Bom478

Advocate for Appellant : S.W. Dhabe, ;H.W. Dhabe and ;P.G. Palsikar, Advs.

Abhyankar, J.1. This petition raises an interesting and an important point of interpretation, under the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. This Act has been made applicable to Vidarbha region by the Extension and Amendment Act...

Sitabai Ramchandra Jaltare and ors. Vs. Masjid Nurun Mohalla Jingerwad ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2 - Order 22, Rules 2, 3, 4 and 10; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 56B, 56B(1) and 86(3); Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951 - Sections 5; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Article 181

Reported in : AIR1979Bom109; 1978MhLJ789

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kherdekar, Adv.

Ginwala, J.1. This appeal under the Letters Patent has been filed against the Judgment of the learned single Judge (Mr. Justice Nain) in Appeal No. 20 of 4967, allowing the said appeal and setting aside the...

Shri Vishnu Vs. Gunwantri Paramanand Malvia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Berar Land Revenue Code, 1928 - Sections 155, 156, 157(2), 159 and 161

Reported in : AIR1974Bom274

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kherdekar, Adv.

1. This second appeal has been filled by the original plaintiffs against the judgment of the Assistant judge, Akola, in Civil Appeal No. 171 of 1960, decided on 22-11-1962.2. The original plaintiffs had filed a suit...