Advanced Search Results

Ram Charan Agarwala and ors. Vs. Shridhar Misra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 1, 2, 12 and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1962All610

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kakkar and ;A.P. Pandey, Advs.

Jagdish Sahai, J. 1. These four connected appeals are directed against the decree passed by our brother Oak in exercise of the original civil jurisdiction of this Court in three consolidated suits. The three suits relate...

Kalyan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 45, Rule 13 and 13(2); Constitution of India - Articles 133(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR1961All619

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kakkar, Adv.

M.C. Desai, C.J. 1. I had the advantage of reading the judgment of ray brother Jagdish Sahai and I agree with him that the question should be answered in the negative and that the petitioner should...

Laxmi Chand Agarwal Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 58, 69A and 69A(4)

Reported in : AIR1962All117

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kacker, ;B.D. Agarwal and ;S.S. Bhatnagar, Advs.

Jagdish Sahai, J.1. The petitioner Laxmi Chand Agarwal is the Executive Officer of the Municipal Board, Hapur (hereinafter referred to as the Board), having been appointed to that post in the year 1931. Sri K. C....

Bhagwati Prasad Bajoria and ors. Vs. British India Corporation Ltd. an ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 398; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 20, Rule 3; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6, 7 and 9

Reported in : AIR1964All75

Advocate for Appellant : Ambika Pd. and ;K.L. Grover, Advs.

Oak, J. 1. I agree with my learned brother that the application should be allowed. I would like to add a few words on the question of maintainability of the application.2. Mr. S.N. Kakkar appearing for...

Brijmohan Lal Vs. Election Tribunal Allahabad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 86 and 116A

Reported in : AIR1965All450

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kacker and ;Ashok Mohiley, Advs.

Dhavan, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by a respondent in the election petition which is pending against him. It involves an important question of law--namely, whether a Tribunal...

Satya Prakash Agarwal Vs. the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 57 and 57(4)

Reported in : AIR1965All194

Advocate for Appellant : L.P. Naithani and ;S.N. Kacker, Advs.

H.C.P. Tripathi, J.1. This writ petition is directed against an order dated 31-7-63 of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal Lucknow, setting aside a resolution of the Regional Transport Authority Bareilly granting permit for a stage carriage...

Karnail Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68, 68D, 68I and 68I(1); Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 7

Reported in : AIR1963All337

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kacker, Adv.

ORDERV.G. Oak, J.1. These two connected writ petitions are directed against two notifications issued by the State Government under the Motor Vehicles Act (Act No. IV of 1939 hereafter referred to as the Act). Since the...

Harbanswala Tea Estate Vs. Srivastava (J.N.) (Regional Conciliation Of ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ702All

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.N. Kakkar

V.G. Oak, J.1. This writ petition is directed against an award delivered by an arbitrator. Harbansiwala Tea Estate, Debra Dan, are the petitioner. Sri Mehra, who is the manager of the petitioner estate, has filed an...

isherdas Sahni and Brothers Vs. the District Magistrate, Lucknow and a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Uttar Pradesh Cinematograph Rules, 1951 - Rule 2; Cinematograph Act, 1918 - Sections 5(3) and 9

Reported in : AIR1972All83

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Shankar and ;Y.S. Srivastava, Advs.

Gur Sharan Lal, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner firm, namely, Isherdas Sahni and Brothers, seeks to get quashed by a writ in the nature of certiorari or like writ, order or direction, three orders...

Ravi Kiran JaIn Vs. Bar Council of U.P. Through Its Secretary and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 15(2); Uttar Pradesh Bar Council Rules, 1958 - Rules 4 and 6; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1974All211

Advocate for Appellant : Party in Person

ORDERK.N. Singh, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution claiming relief for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the resolution of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh dated 4th November,...