Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s murugappan · Page 1 of about 117 results (0.028 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 10 2009

M/S. Vamsee Overseas Marine Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Che ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Nov-10-2009

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Shri S. Murugappan, Advocate for the Appellants. Ms. Indira Sisupal, JDR for the Respondent.

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both sides. Shri S. Murugappan, learned counsel appearing for the appellants states that a tug and barges were imported from Mongolia for use in the proposed Sethusamudram Project which later on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1999

Nilagiri Cancer Centre (P) Ltd. Vs. Dir. Gen. of Health Services

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-08-1999

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act - Sections 28(2)

Reported in : 1999(65)ECC40; 1999(111)ELT326(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Murugappan, Adv.

ORDERS. Jagadeesan, J.1. This writ petition and WMP coming on for hearing on this day upon perusing the petitions and the respective affidavits filed in support thereof the order of the High Court, dated 8-1-1999 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2011

M/S.Sanco Trans Limited Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-08-2011

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act - Sections 12, 45, 8(b); Prohibition Act - Sections 58-A, 11

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.Murugappan, Adv.

COMMON ORDER1. These writ petitions are covered by a judgment of this court in M/s.Hari CFS represented by its CFS Manager V.John Vasac and others v. Union of India, represented by its Secretary, Department of Revenue,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 23 2010

M/S. Mfpl Flourine Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, C ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-2010

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri S. Murugappan, Advocate, for the Appellants. Shri C. Rangaraju, SDR for the Respondent.

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both sides. The brief facts of the case as stated by the original authority are as follows:- “During the year December, 1996 due to heavy rains and floods, raw materials/finished products/work-in-progress...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2009

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai Vs. M/S. Computer Graphics Ltd ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Nov-25-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Indira Sisupal, JDR, for the Appellant. Shri S. Murugappan, Advocate for the Respondents.

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy This is an appeal filed by the Department based on the Review Order No. 167-R/2004 dated 21.9.2004 passed by the Board. The issue involved in this case relates to the question of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2012

P. Bhaskar Naidu, Ceo Vs. Cc, Chennai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Jan-17-2012

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: S. Murugappan, Advocate. For the Respondent: T.H. Rao, SDR.

1. Heard both sides. 2. In this appeal the challenge is to imposition of penalty of Rs.10 lakhs on the appellant, hence, the same is taken up for hearing and disposal by the Single Member Bench...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2011

M/S. Saint GobaIn Glass India Ltd. Vs. Cc (Air), Chennai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Feb-11-2011

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: S. Murugappan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Indira Sisupal, JDR.

1. Heard both sides. 2. In this appeal, the appellants are not contesting the classification and the rate of duty determined by the Customs authorities. Shri S. Murugappan, Ld. Advocate, appearing for the appellants states that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2016

M/s Lloyds Steel Industries Ltd., Vs. The Commissioner of Customs (Imp ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-10-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the second respondent culminating in the detention notice dated 25.11.2004, issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2016

M/s. D. Thimmeswara Rao and Another Vs. The Commissioner of Customs, C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-05-2016

Subject : Customs

(Prayer in W.P.No.27499 of 2016: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent culminating in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2026

M/S Modern Enginnering vs Customs Excise and Service

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-02-2026

2026:MHC:60IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and M.P.No.1 of 2009 M/s Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd., A/2, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Mettur Dam...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial