Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s muralidhar · Page 1 of about 2,357 results (0.288 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 09 2018

Shahzad Ahmed vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-09-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Satish Tamta, Mr. S. Qamar, Mr. Shariq Iqbal, Mr. Abhishek Vikram

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + SHAHZAD AHMED CRL.A. 1196/2013 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Satish Tamta, Senior Advocate with Mr S. Qamar, Mr. Shariq Iqbal and Mr. Abhishek Vikram, Advocates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2001

Ram Deo Chauhan @ Raj Nath Vs. State of Assam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-10-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 149, 161, 235, 302 and 309 - Rule 1, Order XLVII; Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 5, 8, 22(1), 23, 24, 26, 27 and 114; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 72, 145 and 161; Supreme Court Rules - Rule 1 or 0.XL; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 437 - Order XLVII, Rule 1; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) Amendment Act, 1978; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 20(1), 432 and 433A

Reported in : AIR2001SC2231; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)237; 2001CriLJ2902; 2001(3)Crimes77(SC); JT2001(Suppl1)SC300; 2001(2)SCALE298; (2001)5SCC714; [2001]3SCR669; MANU/SC/0297/2001

Advocate for Appellant : S. Muralidhar, Adv

THOMAS, J. After reading the draft judgment prepared by my esteemed brother Sethi, J. supported by reasons forcefully and lucidly advanced there could not have been much difficulty for me to concur with it. However, having...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2006

Sube Singh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 1 14 and 61; Arms Act - Sections 25, 54 and 59; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 86, 120, 148, 149, 186, 225, 216, 285, 302, 307, 323, 324, 332, 336, 342, 343, 352, 353, 365, 379, 384, 392, 393, 394, 395, 399, 401, 506 and 511; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32 and 226; Public Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 357

Reported in : 2006ACJ1138; AIR2006SC1117; 102(2006)CLT19(SC); 2006CriLJ1242; JT2006(2)SC235; 2006(I)OLR(SC)305; (2006)143PLR746; 2006(2)SCALE161; (2006)3SCC178; [2006] 2 SCR 67

Advocate for Appellant : S. Muralidhar, Adv. (A.C.

R.V. Raveendran, J.1. An undated letter from the petitioner, received by this Court on 19.11.1998, alleging illegal detention, custodial torture and harassment to family members was registered as a writ petition under Article 32 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 02 2006

A. Jitendernath Vs. Jubilee Hills Coop. House Bld. Soc. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-2006

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 61; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 47; Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules, 1964 - Rule 17; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : 2006(4)ALT1(SC); JT2006(7)SC183; 2006(5)SCALE130

Advocate for Appellant : S. Muralidhar,; G. Seshagiri Rao and; A. Raghunath, Advs

S.B. Sinha, J.1. These appeals are directed against judgments and orders dated 13.11.2001 and 22.4.2002 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Civil Revision Petition No. 283 of 2000 and Civil Miscellaneous Petition No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2001

T.N. Lakshmaiah Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84, 299 and 302; Evidence Act - Sections 105; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)63; AIR2001SC3828; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)774; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)74; JT2001(9)SC95; 2001(7)SCALE256; (2002)1SCC219

Advocate for Appellant : S. Muralidhar, Adv. (A.C.) and; S. Vallinayagam, Adv

Sethi, J. 1. Claiming insanity at the time of commission of offence of murdering his own wife Gayathramma and teen aged son Bhaskar, the appellant has prayed for setting aside the judgment of the trial court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1995

Election Commission of India Vs. State Bank of India, Patna and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-07-1995

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 74(1), 163(1), 310, 324(6), 327 and 328; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 21, 22, 26, 27, 134 and 159; Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 13A, 29

Reported in : AIR1995SC1078; JT1995(2)SC61; 1995(1)SCALE466; 1995Supp(2)SCC13; [1995]1SCR935

Advocate for Appellant : S. Muralidhar, Adv

ORDERA.H. Ahmadi, C.J. 1. Both these appeals can be disposed of by this common judgment as the question under consideration in both cases bears on the language of Clause (6) of Article 324 of the Constitution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2002

Ezhil and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 201, 302, 364 and 392; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41, 102, 174(3) and 233(2); Evidence Act - Sections 106 and 114

Reported in : AIR2002SC2017; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)48; 2002CriLJ2799; 2002(2)Crimes366(SC); JT2002(4)SC375; 2002(4)SCALE102; (2002)9SCC189; [2002]3SCR431

Advocate for Appellant : S. Muralidhar, Adv

Raju, J. 1. The three accused in Sessions Case No. 11 of 1997 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nagai Quaide-e-Milet District in Tamil Nadu. Ezhil (A-1), Saravanan (A-2) and Mohammed Iqbal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2005

Harnek Singh Vs. Charanjit Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2005

Subject : Election

Acts : Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 105; Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 - Sections 44, 58, 89 and 89(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 100 and 100(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 243O and 243ZG; Punjab Panchayat Election Rules, 1994 - Rules 12, 31, 35 and 45(1)

Reported in : AIR2006SC52; JT2005(9)SC352; (2006)142PLR709; 2005(8)SCALE441; (2005)8SCC383; 2006(1)LC39(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : S.Muralidhar;Sudhir Wali; Mahinder Singh Dahiya, Advs

S.B. Sinha, J.Leave granted.Whether a writ court should entertain a dispute as regard validity or otherwise of an election falls for decision in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 18.9.2003 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2004

Sahdeo and ors. and Satyendra Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-30-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 300 and 302

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2876

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar, Sr. Adv., ;S. Muralidhar, AC Adv. and ;Y.P. Singh, ;C. Siddharth, ;Mukesh K. Sharma, ;Sandeep Singh, ;S.S. Pahwa, ;K.P. Singh, ;Deo Raj Pawar, ;Debasis Misra, ;Mohit Mathur, ;Sagar Dawar

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. Eleven accused were tried by the Court of sessions, Muzaffarnagar, for offences punishable Under Sections 147, 148, 395, 397, 452 and 302 read with Section 149 IPC. There were also charges against some...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2004

Sahdeo and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-30-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 395, 397 and 452; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC3508; 2004(5)SCALE259; (2004)10SCC682

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar, Sr. Adv.,; S. Muralidhar, Adv. (A.C),; Y.P. Sin

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. Eleven accused were tried by the court of sessions, Muzaffarnagar, for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 395, 397, 452 and 302 read with Section 149 IPC. There were also charges against some...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial