Advanced Search Results
Dr. Bhika Lal JaIn and ors. Vs. University of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Jan-17-1990
Service
1990(2)WLN130
Mr. S.M. Mehta
N.C. Sharma, J.1. This writ petition under Article. 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by Dr Bhika Lal Jain, Dr. Shiv Sharma, Dr. Sudhakar Misra and Dr. T.N. Bhardwaj praying that the selection...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. S. Zoraster and Co.
Rajasthan
Sep-12-1979
Direct Taxation
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)
[1982]133ITR559(Raj)
S.M. Mehta, Adv.
Dwarka Prasad, J.1. This is a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, 'B ', under Section 66(2) of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act '), by which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaipur Electro Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Rajasthan
May-08-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 37(1)
[1997]223ITR535(Raj)
S.M. Mehta, Senior Adv. and; Sonal Mehta, Adv.
M.A.A. Khan, J.1. As directed by this court under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (for short 'the Tribunal'), has referred the following question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J.D.A., Jaipur Vs. Mirchoo Mal
Rajasthan
Mar-02-1987
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
AIR1988Raj31; [1990(60)FLR81]; 1987(2)WLN491
S.M. Mehta and; R.S. Mehta, Advs.
ORDERI.S. Israni, J.1. This is a revision petition under Section 115 CPC against the order of learned Additional Civil Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 4, Jaipur City, dated 28-2-84 in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2/84(8/84) whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.G. Sanghi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Rajasthan
Mar-30-1984
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37(1); Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 11B
(1984)42CTR(Raj)228; [1985]156ITR95(Raj)
S.M. Mehta, Adv.
1. In this reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'), under Section 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAddl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Id Mohammed Nizamuddin
Rajasthan
Apr-03-1979
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1) and 256(2)
(1979)10CTR(Raj)136; [1979]120ITR660(Raj)
S.M. Mehta, Adv.
C.M. Lodha, C.J. 1. These are three connected matters which can be conveniently disposed of by a common order. Case No. 64 of 1973 pertains to the assessment year 1963-64, in respect of penal interest for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAditya Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Jul-02-1984
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(1) and 147
[1985]156ITR113(Raj); 1984()WLN499
S.M. Mehta, Adv.
Sidhu, J.1. The petitioner, M/s Aditya Mills Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacturing cotton and synthetic yarn. M/s. Traders and Miners Ltd. is said to have been working as sole selling agent of those...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShrigopal Industries Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mar-27-1984
Sales Tax
[1985]58STC75(Raj)
S.M. Mehta, Adv.
1. By order dated 3rd August, 1972, passed under Section 15 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred as 'the Act'), the Board of Revenue has referred the following question for the opinion of this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd. Vs. the Additional Commissioner, Comme ...
Rajasthan
Apr-18-1991
Sales Tax/VAT
1991(2)WLN390
Mr. S.M. Mehta
R.S. Kejriwal, J.1. This revision has been filed under Section 15(1) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') against the order dated 30-11-89, passed by Rajasthan Sales Tax Tribunal, Jaipur.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVenkateshwara Wires (P) Ltd. Vs. District Level Committee
Rajasthan
Jul-19-1991
Sales Tax/VAT
1991(2)WLN395
Shri. S.M. Mehta
Inder Sen Israni, J.1. In all these petitions a common question of law has been raised, therefore, they are decided by one single order.2. Petitioners-companies briefly slated, on the basis of various advertisements issued from time...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »