Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s m l arora · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.138 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 19 2003

Punjab National Bank Vs. Khazan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-19-2003

Subject : BankingProperty

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 85 and 115

Reported in : AIR2004P& H282; II(2005)BC38; (2004)138PLR458

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.L. Arora, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is plaintiffs appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the judgment and decree passed on 27-7-1982 by the District Judge, Gurdaspur dismissing the suit of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2003

Rameshwar Dass Garg and ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-23-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 408 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : III(2003)BC252

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Mahajan, Adv.

Virender Singh, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of complaint dated November 15, 1997 (Annexure P1) and the summoning order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1998

Sukhpal Singh Kang and ors., Etc. Etc. Vs. Chandigarh Administration a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-16-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 8 and 13; Chandigarh Leasehold of Sites and Buildings Rules, 1973 - Rules 4, 6, 12, 12(3), 12(3A) and 13; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1999P& H156; (1999)121PLR54

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv.,; Alka Sarin,; Manish Jain,;

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether she jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India should be exercised for relieving the petitioners of their obligation to pay the amount of premium along with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 21 1994

Sh. Subhash Chander Vs. Sh. Surinder Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-21-1994

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2) and 15(5)

Reported in : (1994)108PLR351

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv. and; Ritu Garg, Adv.

ORDERAshok Bhan, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of the three revision petitions No. 2099 (Mohinder Singh v. Surinder Singh etc.), 2100 (Sub-hash Chander v. Surinder Singhetc.) and 2170 (Sewa Ram v. Surinder Singh etc.), all the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2004

Joginder Singh Vs. Pakhar Singh Amir Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-19-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Punjab Registration of Money Lenders Act, 1987 - Sections 3; Punjab Regulation of Accounts Act

Reported in : I(2005)BC13

Advocate for Appellant : Hemant Sarin, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J.1. The defendants are in appeal, a suit for recovery of Rs. 90,000/- was filed by the plaintiff-respondent, M/s. Pakhar Singh Amir Singh. It was claimed by the plaintiff-firm that it was a registered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1998

Punjab National Bank Vs. Darshan Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-06-1998

Subject : CivilBanking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : (1999)123PLR746

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.L. Arora, Adv.

T.H.B. Chalapathi, J. 1. The plaintiff is the appellant.2. The plaintiff-Bank filed the suit for recovery of Rs. 1,24,009/- from the defendant. The trial Court decreed the suit for Rs. 1,24,009/- with interest @ 12 p.a....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1990

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Another Vs. Sardar Chand and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-17-1990

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 1 and 27; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 291; Constitution of India - Articles 147, 147(A), 148 and 148(7); Wakf Act, 1995

Reported in : AIR1991P& H185

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.L. Arora, Adv.

ORDERA.L. Bahri, J.1. This revision petition is directed against order of Additional District Judge, Ambala dated February 1, 1989 dismissing the appeal filed by the presentpetitioner, as incompetent.2. Sardar Chand filed a suit against the Hindustan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 1994

Farid Paper Mills (P.) Ltd. Vs. Punjab Financial Corporation

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-17-1994

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 31 and 32; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 66(2)

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas266(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.L. Arora, Adv.

Harjit Singh Bedi, J.1. The facts giving rise to the present petition are thus :On February 23, 1985, an application was filed under Section 31 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, by the respondent for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 1990

Central Bank of India Vs. Raghbir Singh Virk and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-08-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 66, 90 and 93

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas685(P& H); (1990)98PLR457

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.L. Arora, Adv.

J.V. Gupta, Actg. C.J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the executing court dated January 16, 1988, whereby the auction-purchaser has been allowed interest at the rate of 12 per cent. per annum...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1990

Ranjit Kaur Vs. Atam Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-18-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2

Reported in : I(1991)DMC100

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.L. Arora, Adv.

S.D. Bajaj, J.1. Heard. Amended definition of term dowry obtaining in Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,1961 reads ;--'Definition of dowry :--In this Act dowry means any property or valuable security given or agreed to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial