Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s m godsay · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 30 2007

Ghai Construction Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-30-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31), 44AB, 44AD, 44AE, 44AF, 44B, 44BB, 44BBA, 44BBB and 288(2); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 6G(1)

Reported in : 2007(5)MhLj862; [2009]184TAXMAN52(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Godsay, Adv.

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. The petitioner essentially seeks an order directing respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to consider his tender in respect of toll collection work at Lahuki on the Aurangabad-Jalna road and, an order quashing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2013

Praveen S/O Prabhakarrao Jawale Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Dist ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Aug-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: (A.H. Joshi, J.) 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and taken up for final hearing with the consent of learned Advocates for the parties. 2] Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned Advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2014

Dr. Makrand Balkrishna Patwardhan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Education

N.W. Sambre, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard finally. 2. The petitioner, pursuant to a complaint dated 20/10/2001 preferred for and on behalf of respondent No.2 in the matter of theft of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 09 1997

Shaikh Ayub S/O. Gulam Rasul Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 157, 161, 235, 366;

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR213; (1998)2BOMLR388

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Godsay, Adv.

ORDERA.D. Mane, J.1. The appeal is directed against the conviction of the appellant original accused for offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of death. The confirmation case arises out of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2008

Shaikh Maheboob S/O Sk. Moosa Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-29-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 116 and 117; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279, 304A, 337 and 338; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4729

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Godsay, Adv.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Challenge in this petition is to Judgment rendered by learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 1990, whereby and whereunder conviction and sentence rendered by learned Chief Judicial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2003

Nagnath Manikrao Kushnure Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Kailash Bab ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-27-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 307

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)83; 2003BomCR(Cri)843

Advocate for Appellant : Vijay Sharma, Adv. and ;S.M. Godsay, Adv. (Criminal Revision Petition No. 347 of 2002)

N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. This is an application for bail inconnection with the offence under Section 302 of theIndian Penal Code (IPC) registered as Cr. No. 37 of1997 with Sonkhed Police Station, Taluka Loha,District Nanded.2. With the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1999

Anil Tatyarao Solunke Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-08-1999

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 16(1) and 44(3); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 243-ZG; Electricity Act, 1910

Reported in : AIR2000Bom244; 2000(1)ALLMR625; 2000(2)BomCR137; (2000)1BOMLR494; 2000(1)MhLj457

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Godsay, Adv.

ORDERS.B. Mhase, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties.2. Initially, while granting rule in this petition, it was directed to hear this petition along with Writ Petition No. 1 of 1999, in which challenge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2004

Mansaram Sampat Patil Since Deceased Through His Lrs. Smt. Banubai Man ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-30-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR(SC)533; 2004(4)MhLj1105

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kulkarni, Adv. holding for ;C.R. Deshpande, ;R.F. Totla, ;B.B. Yenge, ;S.M. Godsay, ;M.G. Kolse Patil, ;P.R. Katneshwarkar, ;R.M. Borde, ;V.P. Latange, ;D.N. Suryawanshi, ;V.S. Bedre, ;V.M. Chate

A.P. Deshpande, J.1. A common question of law emerges for adjudication in all these Letters Patent Appeals and as such the said appeals are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial