Advanced Search Results

R.S. Korvi Vs. Peico Electronics and Electricals Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341, 342 and 352; Companies Certified Standing Orders - Order 24

Reported in : 2008(6)BomCR894; [2008(119)FLR60]; 2008(5)MhLj75

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dharap, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In this petition Part-I award and Part II award passed by the Labour Court, Pune on 18-1-1993 and 20-4-1995 respectively are challenged. By the Part I award, the Labour Court held that the...

Korvi R.S. Vs. Peico Electronics and Electricals Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341, 342 and 352

Reported in : (2009)ILLJ135Bom

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dharap, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In this petition Part-I award and Part II award passed by the Labour Court, Pune on January 18, 1993 and April 20, 1995 respectively are challenged. By the Part-I award, the Labour Court...

Shivraj Vasant Bhagwat Vs. Smt. Shevanta Dattaram Indulkar and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles Insurance

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95 and 110-B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 6, Rule 17; Workmen's Compansation Act, 1923

Reported in : I(1997)ACC558; 1997ACJ1014; AIR1997Bom242; 1997(2)BomCR384; 1997(1)MhLj175

Advocate for Appellant : : S.M. Dharap, Adv. i/b. ;M/s. Ghanekar & Co.

ORDERDudhat, J.1. This First Appeal No. 741 of 1996 is based against the Award dated 22-1-1996 passed by the Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunals, Raigad, at alibag in motor accident claim No. 153 of 1993. Appellant...

Chief Officer, Ichalkaranji Municipal Council Vs. Anna Shridhar Gath a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226 and 227; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ1241Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Y.R. Naik, Adv.

1. These three Writ Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugn the orders made by the Industrial Court, Kolhapur, in Complaints filed under the provisions of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and...

Walchandnagar Industries Limited (Engineering and Foundary Division) V ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 9A, 10A(3A), 18, 18(1), 18(3), 25A, 25F, 25G, 25K and 25N; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions And Prevention of Unfair Labour Pracitccs Act, 1971 - Sections 5, 7, 20(2) and 32; Payment of Gratuity Act; Contract Act - Sections 23; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rules 58(2), 62, 80 and 81; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Law

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR733; (2005)107BOMLR942; (2006)IILLJ834Bom

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Bukhari, Adv., i/b., R.L. Nerlekar, Adv.

S.B. Mhase, J.1. Both these Letter Patent Appeals are directed against the judgment and orders passed by the learned Single Judge of this court on 19th April 2002 in Writ Petitions Nos. 4730 of 1994 and...

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5), 28 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 227; Trade Union Act, 1926; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Rele, ;T.S. Shetty and ;Aditya Chitale, Advs.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard both the learned Counsel; Shri Rele for the petitioner employer and Shri S.M. Dharap for respondent No. 1 complainant, who claims to be a workman.2. The petition is by the employer Union...

Raosaheb Shripatrao Patil Vs. Balasaheb Desai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR384]

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. This Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order of the Industrial Court, Kolhapur dated 7th August 1989 made in Revision Application (ULP) No. 18 of...

Bank Karmachari Sangh Vs. Assistant Registrar Under Bombay Industrial ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 16 and 23

Reported in : [2002(95)FLR1014]; (2002)IIILLJ810Bom

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dharap, Adv.

R.J. Kochar, J. 1. The petitioner is a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926 and also registered as a representative and approved union under the provisions of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946...

Mangatu J. Verghese Vs. Daulatram Dyeing and Bleaching Mills, Bombay a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28 and 44; Industrial Development Act - Sections 25 - F

Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR418; 2000(4)BomCR286; (2001)ILLJ421Bom

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dharap, Adv.

R. J. Kochar. J.1. The present petition has arisen from a Judgment and order dated October 1, 1993 dismissing the revision application filed by the employee under Section 44 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971,...

Fashion Production Mazdoor Sabha Vs. Smt. Smita Prabhakar Dalvi and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 12 and 13

Reported in : [1985(51)FLR542]; (1994)IIILLJ814Bom; 1985MhLJ819

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dharap, Adv.

H.H. Kantharia, J.1. Quite an interesting and substantial question of law that arises for consideration in this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is whether individual employee or employees can initiate proceeding...