Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s m dayal · Page 1 of about 34 results (0.129 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 06 1998

Daya Shanker Vs. Xth Addl. District Judge, Kanpur and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-06-1998

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC792

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dayal, Adv.

J.C. Gupta, J.1. Sri S. M. Dayal counsel for the petitioner filed rejoinder-affidavit whose copy was served upon the respondents' counsel on 23.1.98 and the same is taken on record.2. Heard Sri S. M. Dayal counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2004

Northern Coal Fields Ltd. (Bina Project) Vs. Central Government Indust ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-06-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2553; [2004(102)FLR254]; (2004)2UPLBEC1647

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Dwivedi, ;S.M. Dayal and ;Rakesh Dwivedi, Advs.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Dinesh Dwivedi and Sri S.M. Dayal, learned Counsels for the petitioner, and Sri B.N. Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the Union of India-respondents.2. This writ petition is directed against the award...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1980

Sardar Gurmukh Singh Vs. Tax Recovery Officer (D) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-16-1980

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 220(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1983]139ITR802(All); [1983]14TAXMAN310(All)

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dayal, Adv.

M.P. Mehrotra, J. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India arises out of the recovery proceedings which were taken by the TRO to realise certain income-tax dues payable by the petitioner.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 10 2004

Daya Shanker Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 16(2); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules - Rule 13

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2356

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dayal, Adv.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The petitioner is the landlord and owner of the premises No. 67 of 310, Kanchhiyana Mohal, Kanpur and is residing on the first floor with his family. The accommodation in occupation of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1998

Reptakos Brett and Co. Vs. Labour Court (Vth), U.P., Kanpur and Anothe ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-07-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 4K, 6N, 6P and 6Q; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Displine) Act, 1934

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC573; [1999(81)FLR222]

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dayal, Adv.

J.C. Gupta, J.1.By means of this writ petition, the petitioner, the employer, has prayed for quashing the award dated 6.5.1991 published on 5.10.1991 by the Labour Court (Vth), U. P., Kanpur, respondent No. 1.2. Respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1980

Syed Manzoor HussaIn and ors. Vs. Hakim Ali Ahmad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-29-1980

Subject : Property

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 13 and 15; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 39

Reported in : AIR1980All389

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dayal, Adv.

Deoki Nandan, J. 1. This is a plaintiff's second appeal. The appellants are the heirs and legal representatives of the plaintiff Syed Manzoor Hussain.2. The property, bearing at present municipal No. 97/120 of Talaq Mohal at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2002

Ram Abhilakh Ojha Vs. Juggi Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-09-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 16(5)

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2841

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dayal, Adv.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia challenging the orders dated 7.3.1981, 21.7.1982 and 30.7.1982 (Annexures-4, 6 and 9 to the writ petition).2. The dispute related to the first floor portion of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1998

Ashok Kumar and Others Vs. Prescribed Authority/Civil Judge (Senior Di ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-31-1998

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1) and 23; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC273

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Dayal, Adv.

J.C. Gupta, J. 1. Heard , Sri S. M. Dayal, counsel for the petitioners and Sri B. N. Agrawal and Sri K. M. Dayal, counsel for the contesting respondents.2. Parties have exchanged affidavits and in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2001

Surendra Nath Bhargava and Others Vs. Ixth Additional District Judge, ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-03-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : 2001(3)AWC2462

Advocate for Appellant : Govind Krishna, Adv.

Yatindra Singh, J.1. T h epetitioners are tenants of a residential house. Sri Satish Chandra and Sri Mahesh Chandra, the two brothers, were landlords of the same. The landlords filed an application under Section 21 (1)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2004

Dwarika Prasad Vs. Xith A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-10-2004

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 41; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145 and 482

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC409; 2005(1)AWC831

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Singh and ;R.N. Singh, Advs.

V.C. Misra, J.1. Sri S. N. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 are present. No one is present on behalf of respondent No. 3--Munni...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial