Advanced Search Results
Hari Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Sep-01-1998
Land Acquisition
Mr. S.L. Hans
1. In this application, the applicant has challenged the validity of the order passed by the respondents dated 30.6.1994 removing him from service and the order dated 16.1.1995 passed by the appellate authority rejecting his appeal.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Veena Kalia Vs. Dr. Jatinder Nath Kalia and Another
Delhi
May-05-1995
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13, 24 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 142; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 13; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 23
AIR1996Delhi54; 59(1995)DLT635
Mr. Manmohan, Adv
1. These appeals are by the appellant-wife against the order dated 23 November, 1985 of the Additional District Judge, Delhi, whereby her two petitions, one for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act. 1955 (for short 'the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShakti Mandir Society (Regd). and Others Vs. M.C.D. and Another
Delhi
Mar-08-2001
Constitution
D.M.C. Act; Delhi Police Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
2001VAD(Delhi)1002; 93(2001)DLT415; 2001(59)DRJ348
Mr. S.M. Mittal, Adv
ORDERManmohan Sarin. J. 1.Rule.Pleadings are complete.With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal.2. Petitioners, Shakti Mandir (Society) Regd., Prem Nagar Shiv Mandir Samiti and a few residents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hindalco Industries Limited Vs. Suman Lata Tuteja and ors.
Delhi
Sep-08-2011
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B, 2 (c)
Mr. Syed Shahid Hussain Rizvi, Adv.
1. The Petitioner, Hindalco Industries Limited („HIL) seeks quashing of an order dated 25th November 1999 passed by the Labour Court and an Award dated 22nd March 2000 issued by the Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevaashish Vs. Shakuntala Malhotra
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Sep-07-1997
Land Acquisition
A.P. Chowdhri, President: 1. Smt. Shakuntala Malhotra, complainant for short, placed an order with M/s. Devaashish for an Enfield Portable Generator Model TP-1100 on 28.5.93. The price stated was Rs. 15,995/- and according to Sale Promotion...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharam Dev Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
May-17-1988
Service
Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 3
34(1988)DLT318; 1988RLR453; 1989(1)SLJ11(Delhi)
S.L. Hans,; Sanjeev Kumar and; K.R. Lal, Advs
P.K. Bahri, J.(1) A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondents that the High Court has no jurisdiction to decide this writ petition.(2) The petitioner in this petition brought under Article...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWasudhir Foundation Vs. C. Lal and Sons
Delhi
Oct-28-1991
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11
45(1991)DLT556
S.L. Hans and; Amitabh Narayan, Advs
Jaspal Singh, J.(1) Is Order 6 rule 17 of the Code of Civil procedure restricted or controlled by Order 7 rule 11 This is the question which has given birth to this order.(2) The facts need...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.D. Bids Was Vs. Indian Airlines
Delhi
Sep-10-1999
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 25F, G
2000IAD(Delhi)779; 83(2000)DLT38
Shri S.L. Hans. Adv
ORDERN.G. Nandi, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has been seeking to quash the termination of the petitioner being illegal, in contravention of Sections 25F and 25G of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkishan Singhal Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal No. Iii a ...
Delhi
Nov-18-2006
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33(2)
[2007(113)FLR699]
S.L. Hans, Adv
Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of order dated 24.7.2002 passed by Industrial Tribunal-III, Delhi, whereby the reference was answered against the petitioner.Briefly the facts are that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›