Advanced Search Results
S.Elumalai. Vs. the Presiding Officer and anr.
Chennai
Jun-05-2012
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(A)(2), 11-A; Constitution of India - Articles 226
Mr.S.Kumaraswamy, Adv.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records from the files of the 1st Respondent in I.D.No.645 of 1997...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGeneral Secretary, Kovai Mavatta Poriyiyal Pothu Thozhilalar Sangam (A ...
Chennai
Mar-28-2002
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 25O, 25O(2), 25O(3) and 25O(5)
(2002)IIILLJ450Mad
N.G.R. Prasad, Adv. for ;Row & Reddy in W.P. No. 10304/2002 and ;S. Kumaraswamy and ;K.M. Ramesh, Advs. in W.P. No. 10642/2002
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. Both the writ petitions are admitted.2. Sri R. Chandrasekaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the first respondent and Sri Sanjay Mohan learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent in both the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.Ravikumar Vs. Ti Diamond ChaIn Ltd
Chennai
Apr-30-2013
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 4.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.No.80 o”1. D.Ravikumar 2. K.Jothikumar 3. M.Doss 4. A.Manoharan 5. S.Palani 6. K.Paramanandam 7. V.Palaniswamy 8....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri.H.M.Ujjappa Vs. Smt. Rathnamma
Karnataka
Nov-03-2010
Land Acquisition
Sri.R.S.Hegde, Adv.
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 4.6.2010, passed by the Principal District Judge, Shimoga, in Misc.No.3/2008.2. By the impugned order, the Appellate Court has dismissed I.A.No. 1 and consequently the miscellaneous petition. Therefore,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPioneer Publicity Corpn. and ors. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jan-29-1999
Direct Taxation
1. These are the appeals preferred by the Pioneer Publicity Corporation Group ("PPC" in short) against the block assessment orders made under s. 158BC of the IT Act, 1961, separately in each case.2. Since all the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Special Land Acquisiton Officer Vs. S. Kumaraswamy
Karnataka
Jan-20-2020
Land Acquisition
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JANUARY2020PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI M.F.A.No.563/2016 (LAC)BETWEEN : THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Cus. Vs. Vanatara High Power Industries
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-06-1995
Customs
(1995)(80)ELT817Tri(Chennai)
1. This appeal is filed by the Department against the order of the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Madras dated 31-3-1993. Shri Gregory, the learned SDR submitted that the Respondent is a small scale unit registered with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Virat Enterprises Vs. Cce Chennai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-29-2001
Land Acquisition
(2001)(132)ELT691Tri(Chennai)
1. By this appeal, the importer is challenging the Commissioner (Appeals) order dated 7.7.95 by which he has partly allowed Revenue's reference with regard to enhancement of price on import of 65 mm tinted float glass...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentwIn Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Oct-31-2001
Customs
(2002)(149)ELT573Tri(Chennai)
1. This appeal is directed against order Original No. 54/2000 dt.26.9.2000 of the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai where-under demand of duty was made in respect of certain fabrics imported by the appellants under DEEC scheme. Penalty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKukkis Colour Photos Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chenna ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-13-2001
Land Acquisition
(2002)(80)ECC114
1. Both these appeals arise out of a common order in Appeal No. 832/99 dated 30.12.99 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Chennai. Since both these appeals raise a common question of law and facts and hence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »