Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s krishnaswamy · Page 1 of about 318 results (0.138 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 09 1956

Ravula Subba Rao and anr. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-1956

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 26-A, 59, 66(1) and 66-A; Indian Income-Tax Rules - Rules 2 and 6; Powers-of-Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1956SC604; [1956]30ITR163(SC); [1956]1SCR577

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. K. S. Krishnaswami Ayyangar

Venkatarama Ayyar, J. 1. The appellant is a firm which was constituted under a deed of partnership dated 10-2-1941, and consists of two partners, Subba Rao and Hariprasada Rao. On 21-3-1942 it was registered under section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2014

Sri Siddagangaiah Vs. Sri N K Giriraja Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-18-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. T.Seshagiri Rao, Sri. K.S. Krishnaswamy Ayyangar

1 R RSA263311 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2633 OF2011BETWEEN:1. Siddagangaiah, S/o. late Thopaiah, Since dead by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1956

Nagubai Ammal and ors. Vs. B. Shama Rao and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-26-1956

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Limitation Act, 1908 - Article 142; Civil Procdedure Code, 1908 - Order 34, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1956SC593; 1957(0)BLJR264; [1956]1SCR451

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. K. S. Krishnaswami Ayyangar

Venkatarama Ayyar, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit instituted by one Krishna Rao, since deceased, and now represented by his son and heir, the respondent herein, for a declaration of his title to certain...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 15 1989

Haja Moideen and Etc. Vs. Government of India and ors., Etc.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Panel Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 392 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366, 432 and 433; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 32, 72, 161 and 226; Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 1983 - Rules 915 and 916

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1325

Advocate for Appellant : S. Shanmughavelayudhan, ;K.V. Sankaran, ;R. Sankarababu and ;N. Natarajan, Advs. for ;P. Venkatasubramaniam, Adv., ;R. Sankarasubbu and ;S. Krishnaswamy, Advs.;Adv. General and ;G. Krishnamurthi, Addl

1. A few of the convicts, who are now in prison for a few years in pursuance of the verdict of this Court and the Apex Court, sentencing them to the extreme penalty or law and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1989

S. Shanmugham Vs. M. Natarajan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-20-1989

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1071

Advocate for Appellant : S. Krishnaswamy, Adv.

Sivasubramaniam, J. 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by one S. Shanmugham alias Shyam for issue of a writ of habeas corpus to direct the respondents to produce the body of Tmt. Jayalalitha, leader of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1992

Ramaswamy Vs. the Tahsildar Saidapet Taluk, Madras and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-20-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Sections 6 and 7; Constitution of India - Article 226; Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 - Sections 8 and 25

Reported in : AIR1992Mad367

Advocate for Appellant : S. Krishnaswamy, Adv.

ORDERNainar Sundaram, C.J.1. The petitioner in W.P. Mp/ 665 of 1991 is the appellant in this writ appeal. The respondents in the writ petition are the respondents in this Writ Appeal. For the sake of convenience,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2005

T. Siva Raman Vs. P. Renganayaki

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-27-2005

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 9, 13B and 13B(2); Evidence Act - Sections 41; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 13 and 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2005)3MLJ1

Advocate for Appellant : S. Krishnaswamy, Adv.

ORDERS. Sardar Zackria Hussain, J.1. The revision is preferred by the husband against the order of the petition in I.A. No. 870 of 2003 for dismissing the Original Petition No. 1195 of 2002 filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2014

Nilesh C. Ojha Vs. State of Maharashtra through Public Prosecutor and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-11-2014

Subject : Education

MohitS. Shah, CJ. 1. Before indicating the prayers for which this Criminal Writ Petition is filed, it will be necessary to refer to the facts noted by this Court in Appeal (L) no.352 of 2014 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1953

Balasundara Mudaliar Vs. Muthuvenkatachala Mudaliar (Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-1953

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rule 3 - Order 6, Rule 17; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 55

Reported in : AIR1954Mad799; (1954)IIMLJ141

Advocate for Appellant : K. Krishnaswami Iyengar, ;R. Aravamudha Iyengar, ;K. Srinivasan and ;S. Krishnaswami, Advs.

1. The plaintiff appeals against the dismissal of his suit O. S. No. 87 of 1947 by the Subordinate Judge of Cuddalore. This was a suit for partition and for specific performance, as an alternative relief....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2008

Kunvarjeet Singh Khandpur Vs. Kirandeep Kaur and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-03-2008

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 232, 264 and 278; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5 - Scheudle - Articles 113, 120 and 137; Limitation Act, 1908 - Scheudle - Article 181; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Telegraph Act

Reported in : AIR2008SC2058; 2008(2)AWC2024(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(2)CHN197; 2008(2)CTC850; 2008(2)KLT296(SC); (2008)4MLJ239(SC); 2008(6)SCALE112; (2008)8SCC463; 2008AIRSCW2726; 2008(8)SCC463; 2008(3)ICC263; MANU/SC/7451/2008

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Sachdeva,; Chetan Chopra and; Saurabh Sharma, A

Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dismissing the Civil Revision Petition filed by the appellant. By the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial