Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s k sharma · Page 1 of about 1,447 results (0.892 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 21 2009

Sh. Devashis Bhattacharya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-21-2009

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Act, 1973 - Sections 40, 56, 56(3), 56(4), 57, 61, 61(2) and 62(2); Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 49(3) and 49(4); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4, 20 and 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 405, 406 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 29, 200 to 204 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles14, 226 and 227

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT780

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sharma, Adv

Gita Mittal, J.1. By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails the proceedings in Complaint Bearing No. 880/1 dated 27th May, 2002 entitled Enforcement Directorate v. Sanjay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2004

Anwar Ali Vs. Mozibul Hoque

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-27-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mohammedan Law

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sharma and D. Pathak, Advs.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. The deceased, Darjina Begum, was the wife of the accused-petitioner, Anwar Ali. Following the death of his daughter, Darjina Begum, her father, namely, Md. Mozibul Hoque, lodged an FIR at Paltan Bazar Police...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2003

Pup Thangchhuana and anr. Vs. the North Eastern Hill University and or ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-08-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : North Eastern Hill University Act, 1973; Constitution of India - Article 226; Mizoram University Act, 2000 - Sections 6, 7 and 33

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sharma, Adv.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. What seniority-cum-merit means in matters of promotional avenues and how to abide by this principle are the two important questions, which hove been raised in this writ petition.2. In a nutshell, the case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 08 2002

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-08-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1286; [2002(93)FLR410]; (2002)2UPLBEC1089

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sharma and ;Sameer Sharma, Advs.

R.B. Misra, J. 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ of certiorari quashing the orderdated 11.2.1991 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition). Heard Sri S.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2004

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-10-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 6N; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 2 and 3; Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Employees (Other than Officers) Service Regulations, 1981 - Regulation 17(2) and 17(3)

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC844

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sharma and ;Sameer Sharma, Advs.

V.C. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri S.K. Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Sri Lalji Pandey, learned Counsel for respondent No. 3/1 are present.2. This writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1993

U.P. State Road Transport Corpn. and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-08-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunals) Act, 1976 - Sections 1

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ39All

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sharma, Adv.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri. S.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri S.K. Saxena, learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri A.K. Misra, holding brief of Sri Uma Kant Misra,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1991

Usha Baghel Vs. Dr. B.B. Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-29-1991

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : I(1992)DMC72

Advocate for Appellant : Kirish Sharma and ;S.K. Sharma, Advs.

V.S. Kokja, J.1. This is an application filed by the wife and daughter of the non-applicant against him challenging the rejection of their application for interim maintenance by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Indore. The learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2007

Smt. Noor Asisha Khatoon and ors. Vs. Surjit Singh and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-11-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008ACJ2084; 2007(2)BLJR2424; [2007(4)JCR282(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sharma, Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal and D.G.R. Patnaik, JJ.1. 3.11.2007 Since in both these appeals, common questions of law are involved, the same are being disposed by this common order.2. The claimants are the appellants in both these appeals.3....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 1980

Randhir Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-15-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 313 and 154

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1379; 18(1980)DLT172

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Singh,; S.K. Sharma and; D.R. Sethi, Advs

Prithvi Raj, J.(1) This is an appeal by Randhir Singh, aged 40 years, an agriculturist of Village Poolh Kalan, Delhi. He has been convicted by Shri R. P. Gupta, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, by his judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2010

Vinisha Jitesh Tolani @ Manmeet Laghmani Vs. Jitesh Kishore Tolani

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2010

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 25; ;Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 5 and 12; ;Goa, Daman and Diu (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 5 and 6; ;Special Marriage Act, 1954; ;Civil Code, 1867; ;Goa, Daman and Diu Family Laws; ;Marriage Laws

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sharma,; Dhruv Kumra and; Sanjay Jain, Advs.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. This is a petition filed by the wife of the respondent under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of Matrimonial Petition No. 9 of 2008 pending before the Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial