Advanced Search Results

Tukaram Nathuji Sonkusare Vs. Dayalnath Dudhanath Mishra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1986Bom109; 1985MhLJ38

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sanyal, Adv.

ORDER1. What principally falls for determination in this writ petition is the width of power of 'review' under Cl. 21(2)(a) of the C.P. & Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order. 10949 ('The HRC' Order...

indubai Vs. Govindrao

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : (1980)82BOMLR605

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sanyal, Adv.

S.C. Pratap, J.1. Order dated 3rd May, 1975 passed by the trial Court rejecting petitioner's application for restoration of her case being Misc. Judicial Case No. 28 of 1973 is the subject matter of this revision...

Prabhakar Vs. Sou. Mangala

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : I(1991)DMC620

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sanyal and ; A. Shinde, Advs.

H.W. Dhabe, J.1. This is an appeal in which the question of the right of a wife in matrimonial matter is involved. It is not in dispute that the appellant-husband is in service in the Municipal...

State of West Bengal and Another Vs. Mohammed Khalid and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 4, 19 and 20A(2); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326 and 436; Indian Public Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 - Regulation 5(5)

Reported in : AIR1995SC785; 1995(1)Crimes397(SC); JT1994(7)SC660; 1994(4)SCALE1048; (1995)1SCC684; [1994]Supp6SCR16; 1995(1)LC469(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : K.T.S. Tulsi, Additional Solicitor General,; B.C. Ray,; U.R. L

ORDERS. Mohan, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 327 of 1994 is directed against the judgment and order dated 13th April, 1994 of the High Court of Calcutta in C.O. No. 9121 (W) of 1993.2. Criminal Appeal No....

Ranendra Nath Neogy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20(2); ;Drugs Act - Sections 18 and 27

Reported in : AIR1965Cal434,1965CriLJ206

Bose, C.J. 1. This is an appeal from an order of Sinha, J., dated the 21st November, 1963 summarily ojecting an application under Article 226 of the Constitution asking for a writ in the nature of...

Smt. Sudha Mukherjee Vs. Sankar Chatterjee

Court : Kolkata

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(3A)

Reported in : AIR1982Cal407,86CWN841

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy Chowdhury, ;S. Chatterjee, ;Aloke Banerjee and ;Tapan Kr. Roy, Advs.

Anil K. Sen, J.1. This appeal from an appellate decree has been referred to us by a learned single Judge of this court as he was unable to share the view expressed by another learned single...

Nath Bank Ltd. (In Liqn.) Vs. Sisir Kumar Sarkar

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 6; ;Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Section 47; ;Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Section 46; ;Companies Act, 1913 - Section 229; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 45

Reported in : AIR1954Cal303,[1954]24CompCas306(Cal),58CWN385

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Sen, Adv.

Bachawat, J. 1. This is a suit to recover the balance due on an overdraft account and a declaration of charge and for all consequential reliefs. The only defence is a defence of set-off. The other...

Sudhir Ranjan Halder Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311; ;Government of India Act, 1935 - Section 240; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 80; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 102

Reported in : AIR1961Cal626,65CWN607,[1961(3)FLR98],(1961)IILLJ283Cal

Advocate for Appellant : Bijan Behari Das Gupta and ;Ashutosh Ganguly, Advs.

Banerjee, J. 1. The plaintiff Sudhir Ranjan Halder, who is the appellant before us, obtained an appointment as a lower division clerk, under the then Government of Bengal, on April 15, 1944. At the time material...

Md. Rashid Khan Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(2)(15), 3(3), 3(4), 3(5), 3(6), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 8, 9, 11, 11(1), 14, 18, 19, 19(1), 20, 20(8), 20A(2), 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 22; ;Explosives Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 5 and 6; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326 and 436; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; ;Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 3 and 4; ;Customs Act - Section 137; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 14, 132, 161, 164, 169, 170, 173(2), 190, 197, 207(1), 397(2), 397(3) and 439; ;Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3(2); ;West Bengal (Prevention of Violent A

Reported in : 1994CriLJ2699

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Ghosh and ;Tapan Deb Nandi, Advs.;Soumen Bose, ;S.K. Kundu and ;Anjan Mukherjee, Advs.

ORDERShyamal Kumar Sen, J.1. In the instant writ petition the petitioner has challenged the validity and propriety of the cognizance taken by the Designated Court constituted Under Section 9 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention)...

Alloy Steel Rolling Mills Vs. West Bengal Pollution Control Board and ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47, 48A and 51A; ;Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rules 3(2),

Reported in : AIR2006Cal75,2005(4)CHN650

Advocate for Appellant : Saptangshu Basu and ;Debojyoti Basu, Advs.

Asok Kumar Ganguly, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging an order dated 23rd March, 2004 passed by the Pollution Control Appellate Authority, West Bengal (hereinafter called Authority).2. By the said order, the appeal...