Advanced Search Results

Gangadhar Charan Naga Goswami and ors. Vs. Sm. Saraswati Bewa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 14; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1962Ori190; 28(1962)CLT423

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Roy, Adv.

R.K. Das, J.1. This is an appeal by defendants 1. to 3 against a decision dated 11-4-1960 of Sri U. N. Misra, Subordinate Judge of Balasore, confirming the judgment of Sri K. P. Mohapatra, Munsif of...

F.C.i. Deputationists Association and ors. Vs. F.C.i. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (1991)1CALLT176(HC),1990LabIC199,(1992)ILLJ697Cal,1990(4)SLR41

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Roy and ;Supriya Chattopadhaya, Advs.

Paritosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. Food Corporation of India Deputationists Association and others moved this writ petition on January 6, 1989, and, inter alia, prayed for a writ in the nature of Mandamus upon the Food Corporation...

Dr. D.K. Belsare Vs. Nagpur University

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1980)82BOMLR494

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Oka

Deshpande, J.1. This is a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the appointment of respondent No. 3 by the Nagpur University, the respondent No. 1 to the Post of professor of Zoology in the University...

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

M.S. Sonak, J. 1. By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299...

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

M.S. Sonak, J. 1. By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299...

Somaiya Organo-Chemicals Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax Bomba ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Thakkar

S.C. Gupte, J. 1. By this Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( Act ), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( Tribunal ) has referred the following questions of law for our...

Hatemali Jamadar and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1944Cal407

Derbyshire, C.J.1. The Rule in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 251 of 1943, and the connected rules in Criminal Miscellaneous Cases Nos. 285, 286, 287 atnd 288 of 1943, were issued at the instance of the accused...

Radha Mohan Malakar and ors. Vs. Usha Ranjan Bhattacharjee and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Tripura Civil Service Rules 1967 - Rules 5, 18 and 28; Quota Rota Rule

Reported in : 2009(9)SCALE280:2009(6)LHSC4276

Advocate for Appellant : Krishnan Venugopal,; Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Advs.,; Dharmendra

ORDER Subject: General Principles for determination seniority The State Govt. observed that certain difficulties had arisen in the implementation of the general principles of determining seniority of various categories of persons employed under the State Govt....

Dilsar Khan @Dilshad Khan vs Pintu Kumar Jeph & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Mr. S.K. Roy

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 68/2022 DILSAR KHAN @DILSHAD KHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Adv.versusPINTU KUMAR JEPH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.K. Roy, Adv. for R-1 &...

Naba Kumar Saha Vs. S. Banerjee and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 215; ;Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Section 1

Reported in : AIR1953Cal96,56CWN589

Advocate for Appellant : Ranjit Kumar Banerji and ;Anil Kumar Sen, Advs.

Das, J. 1. This rule was issued on 9-11-1951 by P. N. Mookerjee J.'calling upon Mr. S. Eanerji, Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, and the Collector of Howrah to show cause why they should...