Advanced Search Results

S. Manjunathan, Vs. the Joint Registrar,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamilnadu Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 46(2), 47A and 57 - Schedule - Articles 19, 23, 44, 55, 55A, 55B, 55C and 55D; Tamilnadu Indian Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1981; Tamilnadu Indian Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1998

Reported in : 2007(1)CTC552; (2006)4MLJ1538

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Rakhunathan, Adv.

V. Ramasubramanian, J.1. The appellants herein are aggrieved by an order of the District Registrar, Ootacamund, confirmed by the Inspector General of Registration and affirmed by the learned Judge in W.P. No. 16405 of 1990, holding...

V.S. Boys Higher Secondary School Rep. by Its Manager, V.T. Somasundar ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ855

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Rakhunathan, Adv.

S. Tamilvanan, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 19.12.1994 made in O.S. No. 34 of 1989 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam, the defendants in the suit have preferred this appeal....

The Nilgiris Co-operative Marketing Society represented by Its Secreta ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1998)2MLJ745

ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The revision petitioner is the tenant/respondent in R.C.O.P. No. 58 of 1988 on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif), Uthagamandalam and the appellant in R.C.A. No. 39 of 1990 on the...

Arulmighu Bhava Ouzhadheeswaraswami Thirukkoil Vs. Director Medical Ru ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:08. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.2508 of 2007 Arulmighu Bhava Ouzhadheeswaraswami Thirukkoil Devasthanam rep by its Executive Officer, Thiruthuraipoondi. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of...

S.Rani Vs. A.Gnanaprakasam

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU A.S.No.663 of 2009 S. Rani .. Defendant/Appellant vs. A. Gnanaprakasam .. Respondent/Plaintiff Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the...

Samuel BenjamIn Peters. Vs. M/S.Hebron Schools Association, and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 96

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.Periasamy; Mr.P.Anbarasan, Advs.

1. These Appeal Suits were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, challenging the common judgment and decree dated 28.04.2009 in O.S.No.21 of 2007 and O.S.No.42 of 2007 on the file of the...

N.Bheeman Vs. N.Bhojan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:2. 4.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)No.561 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 o”1. N.Bheeman 2. K.N.Raman 3. K.K.Raman Petitioners vs.1. N.Bhojan 2. K.Bheema Gowder 3. K.Ravi...

Rajammal Vs. Rajagopal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR C.R.P. NPD No.209 of 2011 AND M.P.No.1 of 2011 Mrs.Rajammal .. Petitioner ..vs.. 1.Rajagopal 2.The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Veeraraghava Perumal...

Jayarama Naidu Vs. Meenakshi Ammal and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 - Sections 2 and 3; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Land (Record of Tenancy Rights) Act, 1969 - Sections 2(3, 5, 6 and 8) and 4; Tamil Nadu Act, 1972 - Sections 16(A); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 40, 41, 42 and 44;

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC566

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. N. Krishnaveni, Adv.

ORDER1. The plaintiff in O.S.No. 34 of 1981 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Cuddalore is the appellant herein. The plaintiff instituted the said suit for redemption, recovery of possession and for future mesne...

K.Ramachandran Vs. K.Ganeshmoorthy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Orders 7, 2, 23 Rules 3, 2, 1 - Section 11

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.K.Rakhunathan, Adv.

1. The first defendant has filed the present First Appeal (Appeal Suit) challenging the observations made by the trial Court while dismissing the suit for partition. The trial Court has come to the conclusion that the...