Advanced Search Results

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Sunit Kumar

V.K. Shukla, J.1. In the present writ petition, subject matter of challenge is the order passed in summary court martial proceeding, wherein sentence has been awarded to the petitioner to serve rigorous imprisonment for six months...

State vs Irfan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Aashneet Singh, Mr. S. K. Rai, Ms. Rupam Kumari, Mr. Max Croson

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 17th March, 2026 Date of Decision: 24th April, 2026 Uploaded on: 24th April, 2026 + CRL.A. 64/2014 STATE .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for...

Yashvir Singh vs.state (Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.K. Rai, Mr. Jyotinder Kumar

$~R-32 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:05. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 553/2001 & CRL.M.A. 8758/2017 YASHVIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Rai with Mr. Jyotinder Kumar, Advocates. Versus STATE...

Brij Mohan Vs. Peetam Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Salil Kumar Rai, Sri. S.K.Rai

Heard Sri Salil Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Vidya Bhushan Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. The appellant is challenging the order dated 29.03.2007 passed by Additional District Judge,...

District Administrative Committee Through Its Member Secretary and Sec ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and IndustrialTrusts and Societies

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1881

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. S.K. Rai

D.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri S.K. Rai, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Sri A.R. Dube, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent workman.2. The leading petition No. 36355...

District Administrative Committee and anr. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labo ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR916]

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. S.K. Rai

D.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri S.K. Rai, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Sri A.R. Dube, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent workman.The leading petition No. 36355 of...

Munna Lal Vs. Kaishav Prasad Dass and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1806

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. S.K. Rai

Umeshwar Pandey, J.1. Heard Sri S.K. Rai, learned Counsel for the appellant.2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 8.8.2006 whereby the plaintiffs appeal has been dismissed and the judgment of the trial...

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Nanhelal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 378

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT217; 2004(1)MPLJ380

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Rai, Adv.

Rajeev Gupta, Ag. C.J. 1. Appellant State has filed this appeal against the impugned judgment dated 21-4-1990, passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Damoh in S.T. No. 92/89, whereby respondents accused persons Nanhelal, Mukundi, Bhaiyalal and...

Deviram and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 34(1) and 58AG; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 41(1); Constitution of India - Article 145; Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules - Rule 34(2); ;Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders - Sections 1 and 2

Reported in : 2005(3)MPHT182

Advocate for Appellant : Y.K. Gupta and ;Chanchal Sharma, Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. It had been stated long back that there is a beginning in the end and the aforesaid sentence, it we are permitted to say so, has travelled beyond the philosophical and mystical realm...

Shivnath and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT260; 2002(1)MPLJ553

Advocate for Appellant : Samir Seth, Adv.

Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. This is an appeal from the judgment and findings recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Sidhi, in the Sessions Trial No. 65/88 whereby accused/appellants were convicted for offences under Sections 302/34...