Advanced Search Results
Jalma Nachiyar Vs. Mohammed Shamshuddeen (Died),
Chennai
Jun-19-2002
FamilyCivil
Limitation Act - Sections 3(1) and 15(5) - Schedule - Articles 68 and 69; Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 21
(2002)2MLJ737
S.K. Raghunathan, Adv.
Prabha Sridevan, J.1. The wife filed the suit for recovery of the amounts due to her under the head of marital expenses, maintenance etc., it was dismissed by the Trial Court below. The appellant relied on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMichel Selvaraj Vs. Ashok Leyland Ltd. and anr.
Chennai
Nov-06-2003
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A
(2004)IILLJ50Mad
S.K. Raghunathan, Adv.
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. These writ appeals are directed against the judgment passed by the learned single Judge, allowing the writ petition (W.P. No. 13626 of 1990) filed by the management and dismissing the writ petition (W.P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Alamelu Ammal Vs. Mangalakshmi
Chennai
Sep-06-2001
TenancyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4 to 24 and 29(2); ;Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 9 and 9(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; ;Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41; ;Madras City Tenants Protection (Amendment) Act, 1979; ;Parent Act - Sections 12; ;Limitation Act, 1908
(2001)3MLJ673
S.K. Raghunathan, Adv.
ORDER1. 1. An important question to be considered in this revision is, whether Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable when there is a delay in filing petition by the tenant under Section 9(1)(a)(i) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Nilgiris Co-operative Marketing Society represented by Its Secreta ...
Chennai
Feb-19-1998
Tenancy
(1998)2MLJ745
ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The revision petitioner is the tenant/respondent in R.C.O.P. No. 58 of 1988 on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif), Uthagamandalam and the appellant in R.C.A. No. 39 of 1990 on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.Rani Vs. A.Gnanaprakasam
Chennai
Jan-29-2013
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU A.S.No.663 of 2009 S. Rani .. Defendant/Appellant vs. A. Gnanaprakasam .. Respondent/Plaintiff Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Venkiduswamy Chit Funds, Regd, Partnership Firm (710/70) Vs. P.T. A ...
Chennai
Dec-16-1997
LimitationCommercial
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 24 - Schedule - Article 37; Tamil Nadu Indebted Person (Temporary Relief) Act, 1976 - Sections 6
1997(3)CTC756
M. Kalyannsundaram, Sr. Counsel for ;B.K. Subramanian, Adv.
ORDERK. Sampath, J.1. The plaintiff chit' funds represented by its partner is the appellant. The suit O.S.No. 31 of 1977 before the Subordinate Judge's Court, Coimbatore, was filed by the appellant against the respondent for recovery...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmmani Ammal Vs. Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. and ors.
Chennai
Feb-04-2008
Banking
Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993 - Rule 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 6 - Order 22, Rule 9; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19(21); Limitation Act - Sections 5; Evidence Act - Sections 73; Debts Recovery Tribunal Act
III(2008)BC229
R. Gandhi, Sr. Counsel for; P. Valliappan, Adv.
K.K. Sasidharan, J.1. In these Writ Petitions, the petitioner has impugned the order of the seventh respondent dated 14.3.2007 in M.A. No. 12of 2007 confirming the order of the sixth respondent dated 4.1.2006 in I.A. No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajagopal Gounder Vs. Madurai Gounder
Chennai
Jul-04-2013
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :04. 07.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.S.Ramanathan A.S.No.749 of 1996 Rajagopal Gounder ...Appellant Vs. 1.Madurai Gounder ( deceased ) 2.Govindasamy Gounder 3.Elumalai 4.Durai Gounder 5.Parasuraman 6.Mani 7.Krishnamoorthy...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Venkatapathy Naidu @ Thambu, Vs. Devaraja Aiyar
Chennai
Jul-22-2002
PropertyCivil
Adverse Possession Tamil Nadu Act, 1978
AIR2003Mad85; (2002)3MLJ343
S.K. Raghunathan, Adv.
Prabha Sridevan, J.1. The respondent filed the suit for declaration and injunction claiming that he had perfected his title to the suit property by adverse possession from 1955. Both the Courts held in his favour. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArulmighu Vedaranyeswaraswami Devasthanam by Its Executive Officer, Ve ...
Chennai
Sep-24-1999
Property
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65, 66, 90 and 92
2000(1)CTC534
M/s. S.K. Raghunathan, Adv.
ORDER1. The plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and injunction. The trial court decreed the suit and on appeal, the same was confirmed by the sub-Judge and hence the 1st defendant has preferred this appeal.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »