Advanced Search Results
Punjab Wakf Board Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-16-1996
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 23, Rule 1; Muslim Law
(1997)116PLR215
S.K. Pipat, Sr. Adv. and; Sanjiv Pandit, Adv.
ORDERR.L. Anand, J.1. Punjab Wakf Board, Ambala Cantt. (hereinafter called the Board), has filed the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India against the State of Punjab, The Custodian General of Evacuee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaswant Rai Vs. Land Acquisition Collector, Punjab Urban Land Developm ...
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-17-1988
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 12, 12(2), 18(2), 23, 23(1A)(2) and 28; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984
AIR1989P& H261
S.K. Pipat, Adv.
Naresh Chander Jain, J.1. Thisjudgment of mine will dispose of RegularFirst Appeals Nos. 818 and 1372 of 1985, theformer preferred by Jaswant Rai son of YogRaj whereas the latter has been filed by the State of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMam Chand and anr. Vs. Sahib Devi and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-23-2000
PropertyCivil
Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(2)
(2000)125PLR660
S.K. Pipat, Sr. Adv. and; Bhag Singh, Adv.
Iqbal Singh, J.1. This is defendants' Regular Second Appeal against whom the suit filed by the plaintiffs for possession and permanent injunction in respect of the land in dispute has been decreed by both the Courts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence Vs. Satnam Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-27-1994
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23 and 25
(1994)107PLR679
S.K. Pipat, Sr. Standing Counsel and; D.D. Sharma, Adv.
N.C Jain, J.1. This judgment of mine would dispose of R.F.A. Nos. 1378 to 1398, 1527, 1529 to 1533, 1535 to 1541, 2132 to 2137, 2139 to 2142, 2144 to 2156, 2158, 2165, 2171, 2173, 2178...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoginder Singh Alias Rajinder Singh Vs. Dharuv Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-07-2003
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63
(2003)135PLR545
S.K. Pipat, Sr. Adv. and; Naresh Kaushal, Adv.
Hemant Gupta, J. 1. The plaintiff is in second appeal challenging the Judgment and decree passed by the first appellate court whereby the decree granted by the learned trial court was reversed and his suit for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Coral Chemicals (P) Ltd.
Gujarat
Dec-06-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)173CTR(Guj)435
R.P. Sawhney with Naresh Gopal Sharma, for the Revenue S.K. Pipat with Rishi Kaushal, Naresh Kaushal and Sanjiv Pandit, for the Assessee
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.The revenue has filed this appeal under section 269H of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The admitted facts may be briefly noticed.2. On 13-8-1981, the factory building in dispute was sold for a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent:- Mr.S.K.Pipat Sr.Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
May-29-2014
Land Acquisition
CRR No.2885 of 2010 & 1 CRR No.3015 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.2885 of 2010 Date of decision : 29.05.2014 Rajinder Singh and anr..........Petitioners versus State of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishan Lal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-04-1994
CriminalFood Adulteration
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113, 113A and 113B; Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 2; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 4; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1) and 5(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7 and 16; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 107, 161, 165, 302, 304B, 306, 309 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 174, 176, 198A and 315; Muslim Personal Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(3), 19, 20, 20(2), 20(3), 21, 226 and 227
1994CriLJ3472
U.D. Gour, Sr. Adv. and; Sunil Gour, Adv.
J.S. Sekhon, J.1. On the recommendation of a Division Bench of this Court, the Hon'ble Chief Justice has referred the controversy regarding the constitutional validity of Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent: Mr. Ajay Chauhan Advocate Vs. Union of India and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-24-2014
Land Acquisition
Civil Writ Petition No.5552 of 1995 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.5552 of 1995 Date of Decision: 24.7.2014. Ashok Kumar and others .......Petitioners Versus Union of India...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.B. Sali, Colonel V-138p Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-12-1998
Service
Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 16A
(1998)118PLR625
R.S. Randhawa, Adv.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. Is the action of the respondent-Union of India in retiring the appellant at the age of 55 years vide order dated November 4, 1988 legal and valid This is the short question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »