Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s k pawanekar · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.028 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 04 1999

Kanhaiyalal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-04-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)156CTR(MP)261

Advocate for Appellant : S. C. Bagadia wit R. S. Chhabra, for the Assessee S. K. Pawanekar, for the Revenue

ORDERS. B. Sakrikar, J.The unsuccessful petitioners (accused) have filed this petition under section 482 CrPC for quashing of the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 10/86 of the Court of ACJM (Economic Offences), Indore.2. Briefly stated the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1989

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sushil Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-26-1989

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1990)ACC139; 1990ACJ848

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Pawanekar, Adv.

S.D. Zha, J. 1. The appellant, State of M.P., challenges acquittal of the respondent Sushil Kumar of charge under Section 304-A by Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Mandleshwar (West Nimar) by judgment dated 2.11.1985.2. The respondent accused...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1999

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-20-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148, 271 and 271(1)

Reported in : [2000]241ITR124(MP); 2000(2)MPLJ82

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Pawanekar, Adv.

B.A. Khan, J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has made this reference and has filed statement of the case, for opinion of this court on the following question :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 2001

Kanta Bai Vs. Gopal Das

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-2001

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9

Reported in : I(2002)DMC110

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Pawanekar, Adv.

ORDERS.B. Sakrikar, J.1. Defendant/appellant has directed this appeal against the judgment and decree dated 3.4.1996 passed by I Additional District Judge, Neemuch in Civil Suit No. 38-C/94, thereby passing a decree for restitution of conjugal rights...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial