Advanced Search Results

Bashishtha NaraIn Pandey Vs. Commissioner, Basti and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2188

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Pandey and ;R.G. Padia, Advs.

R. K. Agrawal, J. 1. Bashishtha Narain Pandey, has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned...

Rakesh Kumar Panwar and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 - Sections 2(5), 3, 4, 5, 5A, 5(2) and 59(3), (4) and (5); Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities (Centralised Services) Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 3, 8, 14, 18, 20A, 20A(1), (2), (3), (4), (6) and (7), 25, 25(4) and 39; Uttar Pradesh Palika (Centralised) Services Rules, 1966; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 33 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Services (Amendment) Rules, 1992; Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (Limitation of Functions) Regulation, 1954 - Regulation 5(A)

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2309; (2000)3UPLBEC2121

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Dwivedi, ;S.K. Chaturvedi, ;Ravi Kiran Jain, ;Vinod Sinha and ;S.K. Pandey, Advs.

R.R.K. Trivedi, J. 1. In this bunch of special appeals, judgment dated 8.9.1997 passed by the learned single Judge has been questioned by which Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 19071 of 1995 and four other writ...

R.N. Ravi Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affai ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant : K.K. Rai, Sr. Advocate, Shri S.K. Pandey, Advocate. For the Respondents : R.V. Sinha, Advocate.

Justice S.C. Sharma, Acting Chairman: Instant Original Application has been instituted for the following reliefs: “i. Direct the Respondent to grant the applicant the apex pay scale of Rs.80,000/- w.e.f. 19.05.2011. ii.Passany other order that is...

Ghanshyam Yadav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR84]; (2006)IIILLJ732All

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Pandey, Adv.

R.K. Agrawal and Sanjay Misra, JJ.1. We have heard Sri S.K. Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.C Dubey, learned Counsel for the respondents and perused the averments made in the writ petition, its...

Awadhesh Kumar Tewari Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 41, Rule 21

Reported in : 2006(74)AWC2719

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Pandey, Adv.

ORDERPoonam Srivastava, J.1. The writ petition is beyond time by 190 days. The explanation for delay is given in paragraph No. 16 of the writ petition.2. Cause shown is sufficient. Laches in filing the writ petition...

Zameel Ahmad Vs. Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Road Transport Corporation (Employees other than Officers) Service Regulations, 1981 - Regulation 17, 17(2) and 17(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC338; (2005)1UPLBEC22

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Bhanot and ;S.K. Pandey, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri Ajay Bhanot and Sri S.K. Pandey for the petitioner, and Sri M. M. Sahai for U.P.State Road Transport Corporation Ltd.2. The U.P.State Road Transport Corporation established and incorporated under the U.P.Road...

Niranjan Gosai Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4708 of 2017 ----- Niranjan Gosai .......... Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ….... Opposite Party with B.A. No. 631 of 2017 ----- Ranjeet Lohra...

Mohit Kumar and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1813/2018 Reserved on :26. h April, 2018 Date of decision:11. h May, 2018 ANSHUL AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. K.K. Rai, Senior...

Neha Sukhla and Ors vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1813/2018 Reserved on :26. h April, 2018 Date of decision:11. h May, 2018 ANSHUL AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. K.K. Rai, Senior...

Anshul Aggarwal vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1813/2018 Reserved on :26. h April, 2018 Date of decision:11. h May, 2018 ANSHUL AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. K.K. Rai, Senior...