Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s k p sinha · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.382 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 1996

Umesh Pandey Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-20-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Advocate for Appellant : Harijee Upadhyaya, Anil Kr. Dwivedi and Dhananjay Kumar Dubey

Aftab Alam, J. 1. This writ petition was filed on 19-12-1986 seeking a direction to the respondent Housing Board to allot a middle Income group (M.I.G.) house at Arrah to the petitioner. During the pendency of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1986

Advocate-general of Bihar Vs. High Court Judicature at Patna

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-02-1986

Subject : Contempt of Court

Reported in : 1986(34)BLJR496; 1986(2)LC50(SC)

P.N. Bhagwati, C.J.1. This Is a rather unusual appeal in two respects. In the first place it is preferred by the Advocate-General of Bihar, the highest Law Officer in the State and leader of the Bar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2000

Birendra Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-10-2000

Subject : Criminal

P.K. Sinha, J.1. Petitioner Birendra Kumar Singh, an accused in M.V. Suit No. 85 of 1993 corresponding to Tr. No. 626 of 1993, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Aurangabad, has filed this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 27 2000

Satyendra Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jun-27-2000

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. M.S. Madhup

P.K. Sinha, J.1. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure preferred by petitioner Satyendra Kumar Sinha praying therein to quash order dated 30.8.1995 recorded by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arrah...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2008

Food Corporation of India Vs. the Commissioner of Commercial Tax

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jun-30-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 3A, 4(3), 10, 33(1), 33(2) and 33(3); Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1959 - Rules 8, 8(1), 8(1)(C), 12 and 18

Advocate for Appellant : Jaya Narayan Sahay and S.K.P Sinha, Advs.

Chandramauli Kumar Prasad and Shailesh Kumar Sinha, JJ.1. Petitioner-Food Corporation of India is a statutory Corporation created by an act of Parliament and a dealer within the meaning of Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959, hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2006

Smt. Ramkali Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-13-2006

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bihar Excise Act - Sections 90; Bihar Excise Rules - Rule 107; Constitution of India - Article 14

Advocate for Appellant : Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv. and Jyoti Saran, Adv.

1. Heard Mr. Y.V. Giri, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Purnendu Singh, J.C. To A.G. representing the State.2. The petitioners in this case held licences for bars-situate out-side the limits of any municipal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2004

Vasantt Chitra Mandir and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-31-2004

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Uttar Pradesh Entertainments and Betting Tax Act, 1979

Reported in : AIR2004All425; 2004(3)AWC2334

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Mehrotra and ;P.S. Baghel, Advs.

M. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to extend the benefit of 100% exemption of entertainment tax for five years to the petitioner as has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2003

Yaqub Khan and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-03-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC528

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Singh and ;B. Narayan Singh, Advs.

M. Katju and R. S. Tripathi, JJ 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties,2. The petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of U.P. Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002, which has been replaced by U.P. Act No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2003

Sakhi Gopal Agrawal and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-29-2003

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 14, 243W and 243X; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 135 to 138, 138(1), 138(2) and 138(3); Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 126, 126(1), 127 and 127A; ;Madhya Pradesh Municipality (Determination of Annual Letting Value of Building/Land) Rules, 1997 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 10 and 11; ; Madhya Pradesh Nagarpalika Vidhi (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 1997; Madhya Pradesh Accomodation Control Act, 1955

Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT1; 2003(3)MPLJ554

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Jaiswal, Sr. Adv. in W.P. No. 156/98, ;Maya Verma, Adv. in W.P. No. 1351/98, ;Rakesh Jain, Adv. in W.P. No. 1374 and 2431/98, ;P. Shandilya, Adv. in W.P. No. 1387, 1570 and 2995/98, ;Sudha Pandit

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1.Expressing the view that the issues involved arc of immense significance and placing reliance on the decisions rendered in the cases of Abdul Taiyab Abbasbhai Malik and Ors. v. The Union of India and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2003

Anil Kumar Gulati and ors. Etc. Vs. State of M.P. and ors. Etc.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-29-2003

Subject : Municipal TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 243W, 243X and 245; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 126, 126(1), 126(4) and 139; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 135, 138, 138(1), 138(3), 138(4), 144, 149, 149(1), 323, 326 and 421; Madhya Pradesh Municipality (Determination of Annual Letting Value of Building/Land) Rules, 1997 - Rules 3, 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR2004MP182

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Jaiswal, ;Ravindra Shrivastava and ;A.G. Dhande, Sr. Counsels, ; Maya Verma, ;Rakesh Jain, ; P. Shandilya, ; Sudha Pandit, ; Ashok Agarwal, ; V.K. Jain, ; Prashant Singh, ; B.B.L. Agrawal, ; Ma

Dipak Mishra, J.1. Expressing the view that the issues involved are of immense significance and placing reliance on the decisions rendered in the cases of Abdul Taiyab Abbasbhai Mall, v. The Union of India, AIR 1977...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial