Advanced Search Results
Krishan Kumar Singla Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-22-1999
Constitution
Constitution of India, Articles 226 and 243R; Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 - Sections 9(3)(1); Haryana Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1996
(1999)123PLR150
S.K. Mittal, Adv.; Vinod Kumar Gupta, Adv. in C.W.P. No. 6404 of 1997 and;
Swatanter Kumar, J. 1. Civil Writ Petition No. 6404 of 1997 was admitted and ordered to be placed before the Hon'ble Single Judge vide order of Hon'ble Division Bench dated 10.7.1997. While Civil Writ Petition No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmit Aggarwal Vs. State and ors.
Delhi
Dec-20-2001
CriminalElectricity
Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39 and 44; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 186, 323, 332, 353 and 379; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162
95(2002)DLT368; 2002(61)DRJ454
S.K. Mittal, Adv
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The petition is seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the FIR No. 102/2001 under Section 39/44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (for short the Act) read with Section 379 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDaya Nand Vs. Har Lal
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-23-1999
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 14 - Order 23, Rule 3A
(2000)124PLR340
S.K. Mittal, Adv.
R.L. Anand, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the order dated 15th January, 1987 passed by the Additional District Judge, Narnaul, who accepted the appeal of Har Lal and set aside the judgment and decree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Associated Builders Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Delhi
Aug-23-1995
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8
60(1995)DLT317
B.K. Divan and; S.K. Mittal, Advs
K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The petitioners have filed the suit under Sections 8 and 20 of the Arbitration Act. The petitioners entered into a contract with the defendants for the construction of 613, Janta Houses in Pocket...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.S. Arora Vs. State and anr.
Delhi
Jan-30-1995
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482
57(1995)DLT525; 1995(32)DRJ391; 1995RLR127
S.K. Mittal and; Mukta Gupta, Advs
Vijender Jain, J.(1) This is a petition for quashing of the Fir No .70/1990 under Sections 452/506/392/34 Indian Penal Code lodged by one Mr.Sanjay Bhandari, respondent No.2 at Police Station - Malviya Nagar, New Delhi pending...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarpal Sharma Vs. Tripta Rani
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-12-1993
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13
I(1994)DMC18
S.K. Mittal and; B.S. Rana, Advs.
Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.1. Harpal Sharma appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment of the Matrimonial Court, Kurukshetra. dated April 21 1989 vide which the divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLoka Ram Vs. Haryana State Electricity Board and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-04-1995
Service
Punjab Civil Service Rules - Rule 3.17; Constitution of India - Article 226
(1996)112PLR332
S.K. Mittal, Adv.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The petitioner prayed for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider his claim for the grant of pension after taking into account the period...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Rajiv JaIn Vs. Citizen Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Others
Delhi
May-08-2001
Trusts and Societies
Delhi Cooperative Societies Act - Sections 60, 61 and 76; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 420, 465, 471 and 477; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 36 and 37
2001(59)DRJ628
Mr. S.K. Mittal, Adv
ORDERManmohan Sarin, J. 1. Petitioner in this writ petition assails order dated 6.7.2000 of the Financial Commissioner, dismissing the appeal against the arbitral award dated 29.7.1999. Petitioner challenges the impugned order on the following grounds:(i) Petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSh. Mahesh Bansal Vs. Executive Engineer (F.C.D. 1)
Delhi
May-26-1995
Arbitration
1995IIIAD(Delhi)242
Sh. S.K. Mittal, Adv
Usha Mehra, J. 1. Shri Mahesh Bansal entered into an agreement with the Executive Engineer (FCD. 1) regarding the work of 'construction of puce drain in between R.D. 1200 to R.M. 1800 of Nasirpur Link Drain'....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahesh Bansal Vs. Executive Engineer (Fcd. 1)
Delhi
May-01-1995
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30
1995(34)DRJ249
S.K. Mittal and; Sharad Aggarwal, Advs
Usha Mehra, J. (1) Shri Mahesh Bansal entered into an agreement with the Executive Engineer (FCD.1) regarding the work of 'construction of puce drain in between R.D.1200 to R.M.18(X) of Nasirpur Link Drain', An agreement was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »