Advanced Search Results
Deb Sadhan Roy Vs. State of West Bengal
Supreme Court of India
Dec-07-1971
Criminal
West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 Sections 12 and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 22(4) and 32
AIR1972SC1924; 1973CriLJ446; (1972)1SCC308; [1972]2SCR787
S.K. Mehta, Adv
P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This petition under Article 32 challenges the detention under the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 (hereinafter called the Act'), It may be mentioned that this and other Writ Petitions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Sarup Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Mar-25-1971
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 326 Read With 34, 307, 352
(1971)3SCC262; 1971(III)LC574(SC)
Mr. S.K. Mehta
C.A. VAIDIALINGAM, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment and order of the Patna High Court, dated January 10, 1968, in Criminal Appeal No. 514 of 1966, convicting the above two appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRambilas Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Apr-06-1989
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 149 and 302
AIR1989SC1593; 1989(2)BLJR49; 1989CriLJ1782; 1989(2)Crimes368(SC); JT1989(2)SC101; 1989(1)SCALE876; (1989)3SCC605
Mr. S.K. Mehta
Natarajan, J.1 This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 407/71 preferred by the State against the acquittal of A-1 to A-15 by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chaudhry Ram and ors. Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Apr-15-1993
Civil
Land Acquisition Act (1 of 1894) - Sections 4(1), 18; Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order 22 Rule 4
1994Supp(3)SCC675
Shri. S.K. Mehta
K. Ramaswamy and; G.N. Ray, JJ.1. The appellants are the legal representatives of Jhanda Ram. One of the lands of him and others situated in Village Hijranwan Khud in the State of Haryana was notified for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamdas Plastic Mfg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-20-1989
Land Acquisition
(1989)(22)LC528Tri(Delhi)
Shri. S.K. Mehta
1. This is an application for modification of Stay Order No. 102/1988-C dated 25-8-1988 passed by this Tribunal.2. Facts leading to the present application in brief are that alongwith their appeal No. E/1842/1988-C the applicants filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamdas Plastic Mfg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Aug-28-1989
Land Acquisition
(1990)(45)ELT685TriDel
Shri. S.K. Mehta
1. This is an application purporting to be under Section 35-F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 with the following prayer- "It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the waiver of pre-deposit may be granted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-04-1998
Land Acquisition
(1998)(62)ECC591
1. These appeals have been filed against Order-in-Original No. 3/95, dated 29-12-1995 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi.Following are the particulars of the appellants :______________________________________________________________Appeal No. Name of the appellant Referred to asE/ 209/...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askipw Containers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Level Environment Impact
Kolkata
Dec-18-2013
Land Acquisition
WP No.1006 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IPW CONTAINERS PVT.LTD.Versus STATE LEVEL ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.Appearance Mr.S.K.Mehta, Adv.…Petitioner Mr.P.S.Bose, Sr.Adv.Mr.Santanu Kumar Mitra, Adv.…U.O.I.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise Vs. Racold Appliances Pvt. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-13-1995
Excise
(1996)(84)ELT122TriDel
M/s. Racold Appliances Pvt. Ltd., Pimpri, Pune (hereinafter referred to as 'Respondent') are the manufacturers of domestic electric appliances falling under Tariff Item 33C of Central Excise Tariff, and other item falling under Tariff Item 68...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Food Inspector, Calicut Corporation Vs. Cherukattil Gopalan and an ...
Supreme Court of India
May-06-1971
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7 and 16(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258(1)
AIR1971SC1725; 1971CriLJ1277; (1971)2SCC322; [1971]SuppSCR721
A. Sreedharan Nambiar, Adv
Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, by the Food Inspector, Calicut Corporation, is directed against the judgment and order dated June 26, 1968 of the Kerala High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 113 of 1968...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »