Advanced Search Results
Ganga Ram Vs. Het Ram and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-18-1964
Civil
Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 35 and 36; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 64
AIR1965Raj47
S.K. Mal Lodha, Adv.
Beri, J. 1. Against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Ganganagar, dated the 22nd August, 1958, who had affirmed the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Ganganagar, dismissing the suit for recovery of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAddl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Thahrayamal Balchand
Rajasthan
Jan-10-1977
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 145, 271(1) and 274(2)
[1980]124ITR111(Raj); 1977WLN(UC)10
S.K. Mal Lodha, Adv.
R.L. Gupta, J. 1. This application by the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajasthan, Jaipur, has been made under Section 256(2) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), praying that the Income-tax Appellate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Goswami Smt. Chandralata Bahuji
Rajasthan
Feb-22-1978
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148, 256(2) and 271(1)
[1980]125ITR700(Raj)
S.K. Mal Lodha, Adv.
A.P. Sen, Actg. C.J. 1. By these applications under Section 256(2) of the I.T. Act, 1961, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajasthan II, requires the Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench ' A ', to refer a certain question of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mukanddas Vishnukumar and anr.
Rajasthan
Aug-22-1973
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18A(3); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 273
[1976]102ITR613(Raj)
S.K. Mal Lodha, Adv.
B.P. Beri, C.J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B', by its order dated March 21, 1969, has referred under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the following question for answer, namely:'Whether, on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskController of Estate Duty Vs. N.K. Sanghi
Rajasthan
May-08-1973
Direct Taxation
Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14
[1974]97ITR119(Raj); 1973()WLN372
S.K. Mal Lodha, Adv.
1. This is a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the Controller of Estate Duty, Jaipur, under Section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, and it refers a question to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHemraj Vs. Surajmal and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-05-1971
ArbitrationCivil
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13 and 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 151
AIR1972Raj155; 1971(4)WLN267
S.K. Mal Lodha, Adv.
ORDERJ.P. Jain, J.1. This is a revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure by one Hemraj challenging the order dated 10th January, 1970 passed by the Additional District Judge, Ajmer in Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Jabarmal Dugar
Rajasthan
Jul-08-1971
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37(1) and 67(3)
[1972]84ITR158(Raj); 1971(4)WLN284
S.K. Mal Lodha, Adv.
Chhangani, J. 1. This is a reference by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench 'B') referring the following question of law for answer by this court:'Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the payment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Shree Corporation and ors. Vs. Chief Postmaster General and ors ...
Kolkata
Aug-01-2014
Land Acquisition
1 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE W.P. 562 of 2014 Sanjay Shree Corporation & ors. Versus Chief Postmaster General & ors. Before : The Hon’ble Justice Dipankar Datta...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYatayat Nigam, Udaipur Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Rajasthan
Feb-25-1982
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 7 and 13
AIR1983Raj17; 1982()WLN273
M.C. Bhandari, Adv.
S.K. Mal Lodha, J. 1. This appeal was allowed after hearing the learned counsel for the parties on Feb. 25, 1982 mentioning that the reasons will be record-ed later on.2. I proceed to record the reasons.3....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCimmco Ltd. Vs. Texmaco Rail and Engineering Ltd.
Kolkata
Mar-03-2014
Arbitration
AP No.673 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side CIMMCO LTD.Versus TEXMACO RAIL & ENGINEERING LTD.Appearance Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Adv.Mr.S.K.Mal, Adv.Mr.Jayanta Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Srenik Singvi, Adv.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »