Advanced Search Results

Pearey Lal and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dabur India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 4

Reported in : 118(2005)DLT479; 2005(81)DRJ20

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Nanda, Adv

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Factual backdrop leading to filing of the two captioned contempt petitions being the same, the two are being disposed of by a common order.2. Being the land-lord of a building known as Harsha...

Hotline Teletubes and Components Ltd. Vs. A.S. Impex Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 146(2), 433, 434 and 439; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 12B

Reported in : IV(2004)BC49; (2004)1CompLJ412(Del); 105(2003)DLT762; 2003(69)DRJ654; (2003)135PLR35; [2004]4SCL590(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Makkar, Adv

Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present company petition praying for orders of winding up of the respondent company on the ground that the respondent company is indebted to the petitioner and that it...

Ajay Roadways Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Financial Commissioner, Delhi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)393; 66(1997)DLT652; (1997)116PLR49

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Makkar,; M.P. Nandrajyog,; N.S. Dalal and;

Lokeshwar Prasad, J.(1) The above mentioned two petitions, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, are directed against the two orders both dated the 2 2/02/1996, passed by the learned Financial Commissioner, Delhi in Case No.150/95-CA...

Marble Art Vs. China Shipping Container Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 161(2009)DLT229

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Makkar, Adv

Manmohan Singh, J.1. The Plaintiff had filed the above mentioned suit for declaration and mandatory injunction and the same is pending before this Court.2. By way of present application being IA No. 8440/2003 filed under Order...

Dilip Kumar Vs. Amrit Rai Aggarwal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rules 1, 2; Delhi Rent Control Act - Section 14(1)(a)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.K.Makkar; Mr.Ujjwal Jha, Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. Appellant is aggrieved...

Sh. Ravi Garg Vs. Smt. Bharti Garg

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)281; 103(2003)DLT315; 2003(67)DRJ201

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Makkar, Adv

S. Mukerjee, J. 1. On 12.12.2002, I had occasion to spend more than half an hour with the children, during the course of which I found the children to be extremely mature and well aware of...

Sh. Chander Vijay Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh District Board Act - Sections 71 and 90; Wealth Tax Act - Sections 2

Reported in : 112(2004)DLT437; 2004(75)DRJ451

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Adv. and; S.K. Makkar, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner appeared and qualified for the Central Civil Service Examination 2002, conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Petitioner being a `Jat' by caste and a resident of Rajasthan had applied for...

Dabur India Ltd. Vs. Wipro Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT265; 2006(32)PTC677(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Makkar,; Meenakshi Singh and; Vaibhav Suri, Advs

Madan B. Lokur, J.1. is No. 608/2006 is an application filed by the Plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC in which it has prayed for an injunction restraining the Defendant from...

Amarjit Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE139; (2009)13SCC769

ORDER1. These appeals by way of special leave arise out of the following facts:1.1 Avatar Singh, accused, since acquitted, had taken an unauthorised connection from the electricity main line for the purpose of energising his tube...

Present:- Mr.Ravindra JaIn Advocate Vs. Uhbvnl and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

CWP No.735 of 2012 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.735 of 2012 Date of Decision: September 9, 2013 Samey Singh …..Petitioner versus UHBVNL and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI....