Advanced Search Results
Suman Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-13-2009
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 164, 156(3), 169, 190(l), 193, 207A, 209, 319, 319(1), 319(4), 351, 351(1), 351(2), 468, 473 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 149, 201, 219, 302, 308, 323, 354, 377, 406, 452 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 207A, 351 and 351(1)
AIR2010SC518; JT2009(14)SC169; 2009(13)SCALE716; (2010)1SCC250
S.K. Keshote, Sr. Adv.,; H.D. Thanvi and; Sarad Kumar Singh
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the appellant, who was named as one of the accused in the complaint lodged by respondent No. 2, Smt. Anita alleging harassment and torture at the hands of her husband...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTiwari Kanhaiya Lal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Rajasthan
May-19-1984
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148 and 271(1)
[1985]154ITR109(Raj)
S.K. Keshote, Adv.
Agrawal, J.1. In these references, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'), has referred the following questions under Section 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').'1. Whether, in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamsharan and anr. Vs. Ramavtar and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-08-1975
Tenancy
Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent of Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 15
AIR1976Raj32; 1975()WLN491
S.K. Keshote, Adv.
S.N. Modi, J.1. The only point involved in this second appeal by the defendant-tenants is whether the legal representatives of the landlord (since deceased) have no right to continue the suit for eviction based on bona...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cit Vs. Hazarimal Milapchand Soorana
Rajasthan
Sep-01-2003
Direct Taxation
[2004]135TAXMAN424(Raj)
J.K. Singhi, for the Revenue J.K. Ranka, for the Assessee
ORDERS.K. Keshote, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. On the application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 196) the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) preferred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCharanjilal Tak Shyam Parwani and Party Vs. Union of India and ors.
Rajasthan
Jun-28-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)170CTR(Raj)346
J.K. Ranka, for the Assessee J.K. Singhi, for the Respondent No. 2 Subodh Shah, for the Revenue
S.K. Keshote, J.Both the counsel for the respondents state that this matter has become infructuous, as the main notices, Annexures Nos. 1, 2 and 3 have been withdrawn by the respondents. The learned counsel for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs. Union of India
Rajasthan
Jul-28-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]132TAXMAN587(Raj)
Sanjay Jhanwar, for the Assessee R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue
ORDERS.K. Keshote, J.Heard the learned counsel for the parties, perused the entire record of the writ petition, special appeal and the order of the learned Single Judge.2. At the outset we are constraint to observe that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCwt Vs. Santosh Chand
Rajasthan
Sep-04-2003
Direct Taxation
[2004]136TAXMAN331(Raj)
J.K. Singhi, for the Applicant
S.K. Keshote, J.On the application of the revenue filed under section 27(3) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur has referred the following question for our opinion :'Whether on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit D. Padival Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
Feb-22-1995
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19 and 233
(1995)1GLR911
Mehta, J. 1. This Letters Patent Appeal against summary rejection of the Special Civil Application, challenges the action of the High Court on administrative side in selecting and recommending the names for appointment to the posts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.B. Phanse Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
Feb-03-2004
Service
BCSRs Rules - Rule 327
(2004)2GLR1299
J.T. Trivedi and; B.J. Trivedi, Advs. Special Civil Application No. 10223 of 1999
Ravi R. Tripathi, J. 1. The present petition is filed by the petitioner,who retired as Additional Principal Judge of the CityCivil Court-Ahmedabad, seeking the relief by way ofdirections to the respondents, to add the period ofservice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSugreev Alias Jagdish and ors. Vs. Smt. Sushila Bai and ors.
Rajasthan
Mar-22-2002
Civil
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 33, Rules 9A and 18
AIR2003Raj149; RLW2003(4)Raj2409; 2002(5)WLC283
Arvind Bhardwaj, Adv.
ORDERS.K. Keshote, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the defendant petitioners, perused the revision petition and the order of the learned Additional District Judge No. 3, Kota passed on 6-11-2001 in Civil Misc. Application No, 95 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »