Advanced Search Results
Usha Beltron Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board and ors.
Patna
Jan-27-2000
Electricity
Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39
Binod Poddar, Biren Poddar, Padam Khetan, R. Rawat, Advs., P.S. Dayal, Sr. Adv. and S.K. Kapoor
M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this writ application the petitioners have challenged the action of the respondent-Bihar State Electricity Board in disconnecting the supply of electricity in the factory premises of the petitioner No. 1 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Warren Tea Ltd. and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-15-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1A), 2(45), 10(1), 80A, 80A(2), 80AB, 80HHC and 80HHC(4B), ;Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 8; ;Constitution of India - Articles 246, 254 and 366; ;Finance Act, 1999
(2004)187CTR(Cal)113
S.K. Kapoor, ;P.K. Mullick, ;Anindya Mitra, ;Dipak Shom and ;Md. Nizamuddin, Advs.
D.K. Seth, J. :1. The respondents had filed WP No. 1232 (W) of 1997 challenging the vires of Circular No, 600, dt. 23rd May, 1991, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) so far...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinod Kumar Sud and anr. Vs. Bansi Lal Narinder Kumar Through Its Prop ...
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-19-2003
Tenancy
(2004)136PLR593
S.K. Kapoor, Adv. for Authority
G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. Ms. Bedi has filed amended explanation of Dr. S.K. Kapoor. The same is taken on record.After having gone through the amended explanation, we deem it proper to accept the same. Consequently, notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
C.E.S.C. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dy. Cit and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-08-2004
Direct Taxation
[2004]270ITR383(Cal)
Dr. Debiprosad Pal and P. K. Pal for the Assessee S. K. Kapoor and Joydeb Saha for the Revenue
D. K. Seth J.The appellants filed Writ Petition No. 714 of 1996 (see : [2003]262ITR243(Cal) ), challenging the notices issued under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), seeking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShroff Brothers Vs. Bisheswar Dayal Meatle
Kolkata
Jan-17-1974
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 34
AIR1974Cal352
Mr. S.K. Kapoor
ORDERSalil K. Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is an application for stay of the Suit No. 2241 of 1969 (Bisheswar Daya) Meatle v. Shroff Brothers) and all proceedings thereunder under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdditional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. N ...
Kolkata
May-15-2008
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 100, 101, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 104(3), 105, 132, 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(3), 136(1) and 138; ;Limitation Act; ;Economic Offence (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, 1974 - Section 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Section 135; ;Essential Commodities Act; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 167(2), 167(5), 173, 173(5), 262, 262(2), 401 and 482
2008(4)CHN765
S.K. Kapoor and ;M. Goswami, Advs.
Partha Sakha Datta, J.1. By this application dated 27.7.2005 under Section 401/482, prayer has been made by the Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence of the Government of India for setting aside the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Om Prakash Kapoor Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-20-1993
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 311
(1993)IILLJ844Cal
S.K. Kapoor and ;Sukla Banerjee, Advs.
ORDERParitosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.The present writ petition was moved challenging the order of suspension dated December 18, 1980, being Annexure 'G' to the petition, on behalf of Om Prakash Kapoor, Deputy Manager (Administration), Braithwaite & Co....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Kumar Agarwalla Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kolkata
Feb-20-1998
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Section 105; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 165(5)
1998(100)ELT333(Cal)
S.K. Kapoor, Sr. Adv.
Vinod Kumar Gupta, J.1. The two petitioners claimed to be associated with Terai Tea Company Ltd., Terai Overseas Ltd., and East Indian Produce Limited and several other companies. The petitioners have their residence at No. 5,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaina Debi Goenka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-08-1978
Direct Taxation
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 24B, 46(5A) and 67; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 276(3) and 293
[1978]115ITR423(Cal)
Bhabra and ;S.K. Kapoor, Advs.
Padma Khastgir, J.1. This suit has been filed by Maina Debi Goenka against the Union of India, S. Roy, ITO, 'L' Ward, and Central Bank of India, respectively, for a declaration .that the plaintiff was and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHeinz Italia S.R.L. and Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dabur India Ltd., S. ...
Kolkata
Oct-16-2007
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 30(2) and 35; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 10 - Order 29, Rules 1 and 2
2008(1)CHN508,2008(36)PTC638(Cal)
S.K. Kapoor,; Anuradha Salhotra,; Ravi Krishna Kapoor and; O.P. Jhunjhunwalla, Advs.
Sankar Prasad Mitra, J.1. The first appellant was an Italian Company and affiliate of H.J. Heinz Company and the trade mark GLUCON-D owned by Glaxo India Limited was assigned to the first appellant along with goodwill...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »