Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s k kapoor · Page 1 of about 377 results (0.214 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 27 2000

Usha Beltron Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-27-2000

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39

Advocate for Appellant : Binod Poddar, Biren Poddar, Padam Khetan, R. Rawat, Advs., P.S. Dayal, Sr. Adv. and S.K. Kapoor

M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this writ application the petitioners have challenged the action of the respondent-Bihar State Electricity Board in disconnecting the supply of electricity in the factory premises of the petitioner No. 1 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2004

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Warren Tea Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1A), 2(45), 10(1), 80A, 80A(2), 80AB, 80HHC and 80HHC(4B), ;Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 8; ;Constitution of India - Articles 246, 254 and 366; ;Finance Act, 1999

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(Cal)113

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kapoor, ;P.K. Mullick, ;Anindya Mitra, ;Dipak Shom and ;Md. Nizamuddin, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J. :1. The respondents had filed WP No. 1232 (W) of 1997 challenging the vires of Circular No, 600, dt. 23rd May, 1991, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) so far...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2004

C.E.S.C. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dy. Cit and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-08-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]270ITR383(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. Debiprosad Pal and P. K. Pal for the Assessee S. K. Kapoor and Joydeb Saha for the Revenue

D. K. Seth J.The appellants filed Writ Petition No. 714 of 1996 (see : [2003]262ITR243(Cal) ), challenging the notices issued under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), seeking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 19 2003

Vinod Kumar Sud and anr. Vs. Bansi Lal Narinder Kumar Through Its Prop ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-19-2003

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (2004)136PLR593

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kapoor, Adv. for Authority

G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. Ms. Bedi has filed amended explanation of Dr. S.K. Kapoor. The same is taken on record.After having gone through the amended explanation, we deem it proper to accept the same. Consequently, notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1998

Ajit Kumar Agarwalla Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-20-1998

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Section 105; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 165(5)

Reported in : 1998(100)ELT333(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kapoor, Sr. Adv.

Vinod Kumar Gupta, J.1. The two petitioners claimed to be associated with Terai Tea Company Ltd., Terai Overseas Ltd., and East Indian Produce Limited and several other companies. The petitioners have their residence at No. 5,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2007

Heinz Italia S.R.L. and Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dabur India Ltd., S. ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-16-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 30(2) and 35; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 10 - Order 29, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2008(1)CHN508,2008(36)PTC638(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kapoor,; Anuradha Salhotra,; Ravi Krishna Kapoor and; O.P. Jhunjhunwalla, Advs.

Sankar Prasad Mitra, J.1. The first appellant was an Italian Company and affiliate of H.J. Heinz Company and the trade mark GLUCON-D owned by Glaxo India Limited was assigned to the first appellant along with goodwill...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2008

Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. N ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-15-2008

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 100, 101, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 104(3), 105, 132, 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(3), 136(1) and 138; ;Limitation Act; ;Economic Offence (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, 1974 - Section 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Section 135; ;Essential Commodities Act; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 167(2), 167(5), 173, 173(5), 262, 262(2), 401 and 482

Reported in : 2008(4)CHN765

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kapoor and ;M. Goswami, Advs.

Partha Sakha Datta, J.1. By this application dated 27.7.2005 under Section 401/482, prayer has been made by the Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence of the Government of India for setting aside the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1993

In Re: Om Prakash Kapoor Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-20-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ844Cal

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kapoor and ;Sukla Banerjee, Advs.

ORDERParitosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.The present writ petition was moved challenging the order of suspension dated December 18, 1980, being Annexure 'G' to the petition, on behalf of Om Prakash Kapoor, Deputy Manager (Administration), Braithwaite & Co....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2009

Pawanjay Steel and Power Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-04-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Companies Act; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 5(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4) and 11(5); Mineral Concessions Rules, 1960 - Rules 15, 26 and 26(1)

Reported in : AIR2009Jhar105; 2009(57)BLJR1437

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kapoor, Sr. Adv.,; Pandey Neeraj Rai and; R.R. Sinh

D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Challenge in this writ application is to the letter No. 5/40/2004-MIV dated 24.08.2006 (Annexure-10), issued by the Respondent No. 6 whereby approval was granted by the Central Government to the proposal for grant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1981

Smt. Madan Debi Kundalia Vs. Alpine Dairy Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-18-1981

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 28

Reported in : [1983]54CompCas41(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kapoor and ;M.L. Jain, Advs.

Salil Kumar Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is a winding-up petition presented on the 24th of January, 1980, and on the returnable date notice was directed to be served on the company to show cause why...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial