Advanced Search Results
Usha Beltron Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board and ors.
Patna
Jan-27-2000
Electricity
Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39
Binod Poddar, Biren Poddar, Padam Khetan, R. Rawat, Advs., P.S. Dayal, Sr. Adv. and S.K. Kapoor
M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this writ application the petitioners have challenged the action of the respondent-Bihar State Electricity Board in disconnecting the supply of electricity in the factory premises of the petitioner No. 1 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Warren Tea Ltd. and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-15-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1A), 2(45), 10(1), 80A, 80A(2), 80AB, 80HHC and 80HHC(4B), ;Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 8; ;Constitution of India - Articles 246, 254 and 366; ;Finance Act, 1999
(2004)187CTR(Cal)113
S.K. Kapoor, ;P.K. Mullick, ;Anindya Mitra, ;Dipak Shom and ;Md. Nizamuddin, Advs.
D.K. Seth, J. :1. The respondents had filed WP No. 1232 (W) of 1997 challenging the vires of Circular No, 600, dt. 23rd May, 1991, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) so far...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.E.S.C. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dy. Cit and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-08-2004
Direct Taxation
[2004]270ITR383(Cal)
Dr. Debiprosad Pal and P. K. Pal for the Assessee S. K. Kapoor and Joydeb Saha for the Revenue
D. K. Seth J.The appellants filed Writ Petition No. 714 of 1996 (see : [2003]262ITR243(Cal) ), challenging the notices issued under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), seeking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vinod Kumar Sud and anr. Vs. Bansi Lal Narinder Kumar Through Its Prop ...
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-19-2003
Tenancy
(2004)136PLR593
S.K. Kapoor, Adv. for Authority
G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. Ms. Bedi has filed amended explanation of Dr. S.K. Kapoor. The same is taken on record.After having gone through the amended explanation, we deem it proper to accept the same. Consequently, notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Kumar Agarwalla Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kolkata
Feb-20-1998
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Section 105; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 165(5)
1998(100)ELT333(Cal)
S.K. Kapoor, Sr. Adv.
Vinod Kumar Gupta, J.1. The two petitioners claimed to be associated with Terai Tea Company Ltd., Terai Overseas Ltd., and East Indian Produce Limited and several other companies. The petitioners have their residence at No. 5,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHeinz Italia S.R.L. and Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dabur India Ltd., S. ...
Kolkata
Oct-16-2007
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 30(2) and 35; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 10 - Order 29, Rules 1 and 2
2008(1)CHN508,2008(36)PTC638(Cal)
S.K. Kapoor,; Anuradha Salhotra,; Ravi Krishna Kapoor and; O.P. Jhunjhunwalla, Advs.
Sankar Prasad Mitra, J.1. The first appellant was an Italian Company and affiliate of H.J. Heinz Company and the trade mark GLUCON-D owned by Glaxo India Limited was assigned to the first appellant along with goodwill...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdditional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. N ...
Kolkata
May-15-2008
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 100, 101, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 104(3), 105, 132, 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(3), 136(1) and 138; ;Limitation Act; ;Economic Offence (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, 1974 - Section 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Section 135; ;Essential Commodities Act; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 167(2), 167(5), 173, 173(5), 262, 262(2), 401 and 482
2008(4)CHN765
S.K. Kapoor and ;M. Goswami, Advs.
Partha Sakha Datta, J.1. By this application dated 27.7.2005 under Section 401/482, prayer has been made by the Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence of the Government of India for setting aside the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Om Prakash Kapoor Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-20-1993
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 311
(1993)IILLJ844Cal
S.K. Kapoor and ;Sukla Banerjee, Advs.
ORDERParitosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.The present writ petition was moved challenging the order of suspension dated December 18, 1980, being Annexure 'G' to the petition, on behalf of Om Prakash Kapoor, Deputy Manager (Administration), Braithwaite & Co....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawanjay Steel and Power Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Jharkhand
Feb-04-2009
Commercial
Companies Act; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 5(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4) and 11(5); Mineral Concessions Rules, 1960 - Rules 15, 26 and 26(1)
AIR2009Jhar105; 2009(57)BLJR1437
S.K. Kapoor, Sr. Adv.,; Pandey Neeraj Rai and; R.R. Sinh
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Challenge in this writ application is to the letter No. 5/40/2004-MIV dated 24.08.2006 (Annexure-10), issued by the Respondent No. 6 whereby approval was granted by the Central Government to the proposal for grant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Madan Debi Kundalia Vs. Alpine Dairy Ltd.
Kolkata
Mar-18-1981
Company
Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 28
[1983]54CompCas41(Cal)
S.K. Kapoor and ;M.L. Jain, Advs.
Salil Kumar Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is a winding-up petition presented on the 24th of January, 1980, and on the returnable date notice was directed to be served on the company to show cause why...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »