Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s k kakodkar · Page 1 of about 93 results (0.077 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 13 1989

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Vs. Amar Sea Foods and Manerka ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-13-1989

Subject : CommercialProperty

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 69(1)

Reported in : [1991]71CompCas663(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, Senior Adv. and ;S. Tamba, Adv.

Couto, J.1. These two revision applications will be disposed of by a common judgment, since the questions of law that gave rise to them and which are material for their disposal are the same.2. The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1992

Shantilal Khushaldas and Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Chandanbala Sughir S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-14-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10, 243, 433, 434, 434(1), 439 and 439(1)

Reported in : [1993]77CompCas253(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, Adv.

G.D. Kamat, J. 1. This application is made in judge's summons praying for the dismissal of the Company Petition No. 5/S/91 instituted by the respondents for winding up the applicant-company under section 433 of the Companies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1988

Shri Ranjan Das Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-1988

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21; Evidence Act - Sections 27

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR302

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, S.A. and ; S.R. Rivoncar, Adv.

G.F. Couto, J.1. The appellant is a businessman running a Hotel and Restaurant under the name and style 'Sea Wolf', at Calangute. He has been convicted for an offence punishable under section 21 of the Narcotic...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 04 1990

Jitendra R. Deshprabhu and ors. Vs. Executive Magistrate and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-04-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 101, 107 116(1) and 116(3)

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR233

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, Senior Advocate and ; S.R. Riverkar, Adv.

G.D. Kamat, J.1. In this petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the petitioners are questioning the legality and propriety of the order of the Executive Magistrate, Pernem, dated 1st August, 1990, in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1991

Ramesh Dhaktu Shirodkar and ors. Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-27-1991

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR659

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, Sr. Adv. and ; R.V. Kamat, in Cri. A. Nos. 3, 4 of 91, ; P.A. Kholkar, Adv. in Cri. A. No. 7 of 91

G.D. Kamat, J.1. These three appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment as they arise out of one and the same judgment and order convicting the appellants under section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2005

Shri Filipe Nery Rodrigues, Member of the Legislative Assembly of Goa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-21-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 73 and 114; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 14A; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 122(1), 136, 161(2), 212(1), 226 and 227; Procedure and Conduct of Business of the Goa Legislative Assembly Rules, 1992 - Rule 289; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Member of the Goa Legislative Assembly (Disqualification on Ground of Defection) Rules, 1986 - Rules 3, 3(3), 4, 5, 6, 6(2), 6(3), 6(4), 6(5), 6(6), 6(7), 7, 7(2), 7(4) and 7(6)

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR424; (2006)108BOMLR227

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, Sr. Adv., ;M.S. Sonak and ;P.S. Rao, Advs.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Mr. S.K. Kakodkar, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M.S. Sonak and Mr. P.S. Rao, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.G. Aney, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1992

Rajaram Bandekar (Sirigao) Mines Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Export Credi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-14-1992

Subject : Company

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR526; [1995]82CompCas470(Bom); 1993(1)MhLj91

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, Senior Adv.

Dr. E.S. Da Silva, J.1. In this petition field under article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners are challenging the communication dated October 24, 1985, sent by the first respondents to respondents Nos. 2 to 4...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1985

Nishit M. Prabhu Verlekar Vs. Chandranath Vinayak Dhume and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-18-1985

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1986Bom46

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, Adv.

Kamat, J.1. By order dated 14th June, 1984 the suit of the appellant who was the original plaintiff was dismissed as being not maintainable for not having complied with the requirement of notice under S. 281A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1985

Laxmi Motor Service Vs. Regional Transport Authority for Goa, Panaji a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-18-1985

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43, 44(2), 44(3) and 47; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1985Bom436; ILR1985Bom1978

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, Adv.

Couto, J.1. These Writ Petitions, both directed against a Resolution passed on 29th November, 1983 by the Regional Transport Authority for Goa declining to grant several Inter-State stage carriage permits to the petitioners give rise to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2009

Shri Sanjay Z. Rane, Vs. Smt. Saibai S. Dubaxi (Since Deceased Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-22-2009

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 4 and 100A; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 9(2), 18, 25 and 53; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; Goa, Daman and Diu (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 1, 5, 6, 7 and 8; Goa, Daman and Diu Judicial Commissioner's Court (Declaration as High Court) Act 1964 - Sections 3, 8 and 11; Maharashtra High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions, by Division Bench and Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1986; Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987 - Sections 20, 20(1), 20(3), 20(4), 22, 25 and 30; Small Causes Act; Bombay (Extension of Jurisdiction to Goa, Daman and Diu) Act, 1981 - Sections 3, 4, 7(2), 7(3), 9 and 13; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 52, 54, 57 and 69; Goa Land Revenue Code

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2668

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kakodkar, Sr. Adv. and ;Rama Rivonkar, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Letters Patent Appeal was disposed of on 18.9.2002 by this Court and said Judgment was challenged in Special Leave Petition by the present appellants before the Hon'ble Apex Court. Hon'ble Apex Court vide...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial