Advanced Search Results
Asstt. Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Mehta Opticians
Supreme Court of India
Aug-26-1998
Sales Tax
(2001)9SCC309
Mr. S.K. Jain
S.P. Bharucha,; M.K. Mukharji and; G.T. Nanavati, JJ.1. This is how Ground A(a) of the special leave petition reads:“(a) Whether the High Court is justified in holding as under:‘It is not in dispute that frames and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSardar Machhi Singh Vs. Cit
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-28-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN8(MP)
S.K. Jain, for Assessee R.L. Jain with Ku. Mandlik, for the Revenue
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.The decision rendered in this appeal shall also govern disposal of other connected appeals being ITA Nos. 73, 75, 76 and 78 of 1999 because all these appeals involve identical point and secondly, they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Mahavir Drilling Co.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-04-2004
Direct Taxation
(2005)193CTR(MP)43; [2005]142TAXMAN663(MP)
R.L. Jain, for the Revenue S.K. Jain, for the Assessee
ORDERAM. Sapre, J:This is a reference made under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act at the instance of revenue (CIT) to answer following questions of law which arise out of ITA No. 1107/1108/Ind/1993 :'1. Whether,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bijay Deka Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Guwahati
Apr-13-2006
Commercial
Mr. S.K. Jain
B. Sudershan Reddy, C.J.1. Heard Mr. T.C. Khetri, learned senior counsel for the appellant.2. The Divisional Forest Officer, Sonitpur West Division invited tenders from intending bidders for settlement of Dhirai Sand and Gravel Mahal for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuvas Estates (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Madhya Pradesh
May-12-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148 and 260A
(2004)189CTR(MP)130; [2004]270ITR373(MP)
G.M. Chafekar and ;S.K. Jain, Advs.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act filed by an assesses against an order, dt. 17th Sept., 2002, passed by Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench at Indore (for short called...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVikaschand Mansingka Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-18-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254(1)
(2004)191CTR(MP)259
G.M. Chafekar and ;S.K. Jain, Advs.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This is an appeal filed by an assessee under Section 260A of the IT Act against an order dt. 30th Aug., 2001, passed by Tribunal, Indore, in MA No. 64/Ind/2000. It was admitted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri B.S. Yaduvanshi Vs. National Seeds Corporation Ltd.
Delhi
May-01-2006
Service
Fundamental Rules - Rule 56; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311
2006(89)DRJ342; 2007(1)SLJ332(Delhi)
S.K. Jain, Adv
ORDER No. 67WHEREAS the Chairperson-cum-Managing Director, National Seeds Corporation Limited is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so; NOW thereforeE, in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (j) (i)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamji Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jun-02-1989
Criminal
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 4; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 99, 147, 149, 225, 307, 323, 325, 332, 333, 336, 394 and 395
1990CriLJ392; 1989(2)WLN578
S.K. Jain and; N.K. Maloo, Advs.
S.S. Byas, J.1. On 29-1-1988, the judgment was pronounced. The appeal was allowed, the judgment of the trial court was set aside and the appellants were acquitted. Reasons were to be stated later on and they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanhaiya Lal and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mar-01-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313
RLW2006(3)Raj1984; 2006(3)WLC656
S.K. Jain, Adv.
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. The accused appellants have challenged the judgment dated 16.4.2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Bundi, whereby they have been convicted for offence Under Section 302 IPC and have been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLaxman Prasad Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Aug-26-2008
Criminal
RLW2009(2)Raj990
Shri. S.K. Jain
Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the accused-appellant against the judgment dated 10.7.1987 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bundi whereby he was convicted for offence under Section 5 of the. Explosive...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »