Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s k gupta · Page 1 of about 1,004 results (0.309 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 25 2011

Hariom Chauhan. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-25-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 341(1), 342(2), 142 ;

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv.

1. The petitioner applied for the post of TGT (Hindi) under the Directorate of Education in response to the advertisement No. 06/2006 by Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (for brevity the DSSSB). In the application for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2011

R.D. Verma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-18-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G.D. Gupta; Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No1. Invoking the jurisdiction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2011

D.D. Kaushik Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-18-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G.D. Gupta; Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No1. Invoking the jurisdiction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 22 2011

Dr. D.P. Ray Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Commission ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-22-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Shri S.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Praveen Swarup, Advocate.

By Dr. Veena Chhotray: 1. The applicant holding the post of Chief Medical Officer in the Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi (Respondent no.3) is challenging the issuance of the Charge Memorandum dated 26.11.2009. The OA seeks quashing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2012

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Department ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-01-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with S.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: R.N. Singh, Advocate.

ORDER Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A): The applicant, Shri Ashok Kumar Aggarwal, a 1985 Batch of Indian Revenue Service (Income Tax) Officer having put in 14 years of service was placed under suspension in 1999...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1998

Surya Prakash and Naraini Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-29-1998

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 215 and 464; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 113B

Reported in : II(1998)DMC118

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Gupta and; Shree Swami, Advs.

Rajendra Saxena, J.1. Appellant Surya Prakash, his mother appellant-Naraini and his father Shankerlal faced trial for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A, IPC before the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Jaipur City- Jaipur, who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2004

Ashirvad Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-22-2004

Subject : Direct TaxationCriminal

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245C, 245(D)(1), 245(D)(4), 245H, 245H(1A), 245H(2) and 276C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.PC), 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Finance Act, 1987

Reported in : 2004(2)BLJR888; 2004CriLJ3110; (2004)187CTR(SC)609; 2004(168)ELT433(SC); [2004]266ITR578(SC); [2004(2)JCR213(SC)]; JT2004(4)SC6; 2004(3)SCALE515; (2004)3SCC624

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Gupta,; D.V. Pathy and; Anurag Pandey, Advs

Arijit Pasayat, J. 1 Prosecution was launched against the appellants for alleged concealment of income and thereby willfully attempting to evade tax, and for making false statement on verification in terms of Sections 276C of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1949

Commissioner of Income-tax Central Vs. Dudwala and Co.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-31-1949

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 26A

Reported in : AIR1950Cal315,[1950]18ITR653(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Gupta and ; J.C. Pal, Advs.

Chatterjee, J.1. At the instance of the Commissioners of Income-tax, the question of law which has been referred to this Court for its opinion by the Tribunal is in these terms :'Whether on the facts and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2012

K.S. Meena Vs. the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, Ne ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: S.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: R.V. Sinha, R.N. Singh, Advocates.

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A): 1. The applicant is a confirmed DANICS Officer w.e.f. 01.07.1992. He on completion of four years w.e.f. 01.07.1996became eligible along with his batch officers to get time scale in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2010

In Re: Europlast India Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-07-2010

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 192A, 193, 391, 391(4) and 392; Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (Finance Establishment) Act, 1999; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53; Negotiable Instrument Act - Sections 138

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj S. Shah, Adv. for Noticee Nos. 5 and 6, ;Ram Apte, Sr. Counsel and ;A.A. Garge, Adv. for Creditor (Ashoka Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.), ;Satish Shah and ;A.C. Tamhane, Advs., i/b., Tamhane & Co. for

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This common order will dispose of all the pending applications, show cause notices and Chairman' reports.2. The background in which the present proceedings have emanated can be briefly mentioned as follows: The unsecured...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial