Advanced Search Results

Bhagwati Prasad Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 302, 304 and 323

Reported in : AIR2010SC349; 2010CriLJ528; 2009(14)SCALE314; (2010)1SCC697; 2009(10)LC4991(SC); 2009AIRSCW7503

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Dubey, Sr. Adv.,; J.P. Pandy and; Yogesh Tiwari, A

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Appellant herein, who was original accused No. 6 (A-6) in the trial, has challenged the judgment of the High Court, allowing the State's Appeal and setting aside the judgment of acquittal passed by...

Ndraprastha Power Generation Company Ltd. Vs. Pratap Singh (Workman)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.K. Dubey, Adv.

1. The Petitioner, Indraprastha Power Generation Company Ltd. [„IPGCL], challenges an Award dated 12th September 2001 passed by the Industrial Tribunal [„Tribunal]. By the impugned Award the Tribunal held the non-promotion to the Respondent on the...

State of M.P. and anr. Vs. Md. Abrahin

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 61 and 62; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 16

Reported in : AIR2009SC2892; (2009)IIILLJ365SC; RLW2010(1)SC130; 2009(7)SCALE609:2009AIRSCW4533

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Dubey, Sr. Adv.,; B.S. Banthia,; Vikas Upadhyay and

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Respondent was appointed on the post of driver on daily-wage basis. He was initially appointed for 89 days. His services admittedly had not been regularized. He was not placed in the...

New India Assurance Co. Vs. Smt. Phoolwati and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 92A and 110D

Reported in : AIR1986MP187; 1986MPLJ13

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Dubey, Adv.

ORDERT.N. Singh, J. 1. Narayan lost his life two years ago while commuting in a motor vehicle. This happened in the City of Gwalior, where the easy and convenient mode of public transportis the veritable 'Tempo'....

State of Madhya Pradesh and ors. Vs. Yogesh Chandra Dubey and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41; Factories Act; Madhya Pradesh Public Health Engineering Department (Non-Gazetted) Service (Conditions of Service and Recruitment) Rules, 1976 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR332]; JT2006(8)SC595; (2006)IIILLJ1060SC; (2006)4MLJ932(SC); 2006(4)MPHT321; 2006(9)SCALE73; (2006)8SCC67; 2006(3)ShimLC284; 2007(2)SLJ186(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Dubey, Sr. Adv. and; B.S. Bantia, Adv

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the respondents, who were engaged on daily wages, are entitled to claim minimum of the pay scale attached to the post in which they had been working with applicable allowances,...

State of M.P. and ors. Vs. Lalit Kumar Verma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960; Madhya Pradesh Revised Pay Rules, 1998; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 16; Recruitment Rules - Rule 28

Reported in : AIR2007SC528; [2007(112)FLR345]; 2006(12)SCALE642; (2007)1SCC575; 2007AIRSCW70; 2007-I-LLJ789; 2007(2)KCCRSN36(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Dubey, Sr. Adv.,; Amit Mishra and; B.S. Banthia, Ad

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Respondent herein was appointed on daily wages. Indisputably, his recruitment was not made in terms of the statutory rules. No offer of appointment was also issued. He filed an application before...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Parul Debnath and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Manipur Home Guards Act, 1966; Andaman and Nicobar Home Guard Rules, 1965; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 141 and 240(1); Andaman and Nicobar Islands Home Guard Regulation, 1964 - Regulations 4 and 16

Reported in : AIR2009SC3085; JT2009(9)SC134; 2009(7)SCALE255

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Dubey, Sr. Adv.,; S. Wasim A. Qadri,; Subhash Kaushik

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted.2. In exercise of powers conferred by Article 240(1) of the Constitution of India, the President of India promulgated the 'Andaman & Nicobar Islands Home Guard Regulation, 1964' (hereinafter referred to as...

Guddu @ Santosh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 122, 176, 354, 375, 376, 376(2), 399 and 511

Reported in : JT2006(6)SC120; 2006(4)MPHT218

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Dubey, Sr. Adv.,; L.S. Chauhan,; Chandra Mohan Snisett

ORDER1. The appellant herein was charged with commission of an offence under Section 376 of the IPC for committing rape on a minor girl Sushama. Her parents are labourers. They had been occupying a portion of...

M.P. State Coop. Bank Ltd., Bhopal Vs. Nanuram Yadav and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Lokayukt Evam Up-Lokayukt Adhiniyam, 1981 - Sections 2, 3, 7, 8, 10 and 12; Staff Service Rules, 1976 - Rules 3, 14, 21, 22, 23 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 142 and 162; Employment Exchange (Notification of vacancies) Act, 1959; Madhya Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2 and 55(1); Madhya Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules; Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sahakari Bank Employees (Terms of Employment and Working Conditions) Rules, 1976; Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981; Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Rules, 1988 - Rule 149(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2792; JT2007(11)SC369; 2007(11)SCALE439; (2007)8SCC264; 2008(1)SLJ368(SC); 2007AIRSCW6036; [2007] 10 SCR 307

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Gambhir and; S.K. Dubey, Sr. Advs.,; Sanjay Kapur,;

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.2. How public appointments to be made, whether Lokayukt constituted under the M.P. Lokayukt Evam Up-Lokayukt Adhiniyam, 1981 has jurisdiction to go into the appointment of...

State of M.P. and anr. Vs. Anshuman Shukla

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 3, 4 to 24, 29, 29(2), 31 and 81; Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 19; Evidence Act - Sections 3; Court of Enquiry Act; Bihar and Orissa Cooperative Societies Act; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950; Contempt of Court Act; Bihar Administrative Tribunal Act; Income Tax Act - Sections 2451; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10A; Companies Act - Sections 111(3); Tribunals and Inquiries Act, 1958; Tribunals and Inquiries (Amendment) Act, 1971; Arbitration Act, 1940; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1944; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5, 29(2); Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1922; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2 and 115 - Order 21

Reported in : AIR2008SC2454; 2008(2)ARBLR485(SC); 2008(8)SCALE425; (2008)7SCC487; 2008AIRSCW3760; 2008(4)Supreme335

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Dubey, Sr. Adv.,; B.S. Banthia,; Vikas Upadhyay and

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (for short the 1963 Act) in the matter of entertaining a revision application before the High Court in terms of Section 19...