Advanced Search Results

Arun Vs. Subhash

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.K.Agrawal, Shri. Piyush Bhatnagar

1 W.P.No.6348/2013 26/4/2013: Shri S.K.Agrawal with Shri Piyush Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Challenge in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is made to an interlocutory order dated 24.1.2013 passed by 1st Civil...

M/S Suryavansham Mining and Minerals Pvt. Ltd Vs. the State of Madhya ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.K.Agrawal

Writ Petition No.19185/12. 27.11.2012 Shri S.K.Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sharda Dubey, learned P.L.for the respondent no.1 & 2-State. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226...

Hundraj Chhangomal and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1978)19GLR34

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.K. Agrawal

M.C. Trivedi, J.1. This group of 24 appeals is decided by this common judgments because a common question of interpretation of Sections 73, 74 and 76 of the Indian Railways Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as...

Ashok Kumar Wasnik Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.K.Agrawal

1 W.P.No.5105/2007 25/7/2012: Shri S.K.Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for the respondents. Heard on I.A.No.8954/2012. This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking an interim direction to the respondents...

Smt.Shobha Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Shri. S.K.Agrawal

W.P.No.10442/2008 29.6.2012 Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Mohan Saunsarkar, learned counsel for Union of India. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents- State. Petitioner is a widow of Late...

Rajesh Gupta Vs. Prabha Gupta

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13 and 13(1)

Reported in : 2006(3)MPLJ378

Advocate for Appellant : Shobha Menon, Sr. Adv. and ;Neelesh Pillai, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the appellant has called in question the presentableness of the judgment and decree dated 15-3-2005 passed by the learned Presiding...

Peoples' Union for Civil Liberties, U.P. Bench Vs. State of U.P. and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - Sections 2(1), 3, 9, 10, 12 to 18, 20, 21, 21(1), (2) and (3), 22, 22(1), 29, 30 and 31; Constitution of India - Articles 215 and 226; Protection of Human Rights Ordinance, 1993; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 58 and 176; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123; President's Rule; Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC729

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi Kiran Jain, ;K.K. Roy and ;Pushkar Mehrotra, Advs.

Binod Kumar Roy and R. K. Singh, JJ.1. The petitioner has come up to this Court for commanding respondent No. 1 the State of U. P. to (i) constitute a State Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred...

Satish Tiwari Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT473; 2001(2)MPLJ451

Advocate for Appellant : Vipin Yadav, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the...

Sharad B. Pandit Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1998)3GLR2578

S.K. Keshote, J.1. As all these three petitions are identical in nature, the same are taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. The respondent No. 2, as stated by...

Nuchem Ltd Vs. Cce, Rohtak

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Present for the Appellant: L.P. Asthana, and Ms. Neha Gulati, Advocates. Present for Respondent: DR. R.K. Varma, Advocates.

Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa, J. 1. The present appeal stands filed against the order of the Commissioner, Rohtak vide which he has confiscated the Medium Density Fibre Boards (hereinafter referred to as MDF Boards) totally valued...