Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s k agrawal · Page 1 of about 65 results (0.106 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 12 2000

Peoples' Union for Civil Liberties, U.P. Bench Vs. State of U.P. and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-12-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - Sections 2(1), 3, 9, 10, 12 to 18, 20, 21, 21(1), (2) and (3), 22, 22(1), 29, 30 and 31; Constitution of India - Articles 215 and 226; Protection of Human Rights Ordinance, 1993; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 58 and 176; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123; President's Rule; Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC729

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi Kiran Jain, ;K.K. Roy and ;Pushkar Mehrotra, Advs.

Binod Kumar Roy and R. K. Singh, JJ.1. The petitioner has come up to this Court for commanding respondent No. 1 the State of U. P. to (i) constitute a State Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2000

Satish Tiwari Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-06-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT473; 2001(2)MPLJ451

Advocate for Appellant : Vipin Yadav, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2003

S.P. Jauhari Vs. Madhya Pradesh Laghu Udyog Nigam Maryadit

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-20-2003

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT533; 2003(3)MPLJ481

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Shroti, Sr. Adv. and Ashish Shroti, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of order dated 31-12-2002, Annexure...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 10 2001

Sheikh Shahzad Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-10-2001

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107, 109, 110, 116, 117 and 151; Police Act, 1861; Police Regulation - Regulations 243, 249, 651, 851, 855 and 856; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307 and 324; Punjab Police Rules - Rule 23.4, 23.5 and 23.7; Gambling Act - Sections 13(4)

Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT202

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Gangrade and ;U.K. Shukla, Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. By this writ petition preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of the order directing surveillance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2006

Rajesh Gupta Vs. Prabha Gupta

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-20-2006

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13 and 13(1)

Reported in : 2006(3)MPLJ378

Advocate for Appellant : Shobha Menon, Sr. Adv. and ;Neelesh Pillai, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the appellant has called in question the presentableness of the judgment and decree dated 15-3-2005 passed by the learned Presiding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1997

Sharad B. Pandit Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-16-1997

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1998)3GLR2578

S.K. Keshote, J.1. As all these three petitions are identical in nature, the same are taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. The respondent No. 2, as stated by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2012

Nuchem Ltd Vs. Cce, Rohtak

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Present for the Appellant: L.P. Asthana, and Ms. Neha Gulati, Advocates. Present for Respondent: DR. R.K. Varma, Advocates.

Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa, J. 1. The present appeal stands filed against the order of the Commissioner, Rohtak vide which he has confiscated the Medium Density Fibre Boards (hereinafter referred to as MDF Boards) totally valued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2012

M/S Suryavansham Mining and Minerals Pvt. Ltd Vs. the State of Madhya ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-27-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.K.Agrawal

Writ Petition No.19185/12. 27.11.2012 Shri S.K.Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sharda Dubey, learned P.L.for the respondent no.1 & 2-State. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2013

Arun Vs. Subhash

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-2013

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.K.Agrawal, Shri. Piyush Bhatnagar

1 W.P.No.6348/2013 26/4/2013: Shri S.K.Agrawal with Shri Piyush Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Challenge in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is made to an interlocutory order dated 24.1.2013 passed by 1st Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2002

Pradeshia Industrial and Investment Corpn. of U.P. Ltd. Vs. State of U ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-23-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 451 and 456

Reported in : [2003]47SCL126(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha and ;Anurag Khanna, Advs.

ORDERSunil Ambwani, J.1. Pradeshia Industrial & Investment Corporation of U.P. Ltd. (hereinafter called as PICUP) has filed these Criminal Revision Nos. 41 of 2000 and 49 of 2000 against the Judgment and Order dated 20-12-1999 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial