Advanced Search Results

Uttam Manohar Nakate Vs. Bharat Forge Company Ltd., Pune and ors. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28

Reported in : 2002(2)ALLMR329; 2002(1)BomCR401; [2002(93)FLR293]; 2002(2)MhLj395

Advocate for Appellant : S.J. Deshmukh and ;N.M. Ganguli, Advs.

1. The learned Single Judge, by his judgment dated 9th February, 1995, affirmed the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 12th June, 1987, whereby the appellant's dismissal .from service was held to be proper. In this...

Glaxo India Ltd., a Pharmaceutical Company Vs. Mr. C. Gupta and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92-A; Industrial Employment Standing Order Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 153; M.P. Industrial Relations Act

Reported in : 1999(2)ALLMR482; 1999(3)BomCR401; (1999)2BOMLR758; [1999(82)FLR389]; (1999)IILLJ718Bom; 1999(2)MhLj410

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Rele, ;S.S. Pakale, ;S.J. Deshmukh and ;N.M. Ganguli, Advs.

ORDERN.J. Pandya, J.1. First of the two petitions is filed by the company and the second one is filed by the employee who claims to be the workman. Relationship of master and servant is not in...

Association of Engineering Workers Vs. Indian Smelting and Refinery Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7, 10(1), 12(5), 33 and 39; Trade Unions Act, 1926; Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR485; 2000(3)BomCR75; (2000)IILLJ340Bom; 2000(3)MhLj535

Advocate for Appellant : S.J. Deshmukh and ;N.M. Ganguli, Advs.

ORDERV.C. DAGA, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 7th February 1995 passed in Writ Petition No. 21 of 1995, dismissing the writ petition challenging the order passed by...

R.K. Shinde and ors. Vs. Shekoba Auto Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporate ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 26 and 28; Factories Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 5, 7, 9A, 25F, 25G, 25K, 25L, 25N and 25O; Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR277; 2008(1)BomCR602; (2007)109BOMLR2701; (2008)IILLJ1037Bom

Advocate for Appellant : S.J. Deshmukh, ;N.D. Buch, ;H.D. Buch, ;S.K. More and ;B.B. Dholkia, Advs.

J.N. Patel, J.1. By this Letters Patent Appeal the Petitioners, employees of the respondent, have impugned the judgment and order dated 3rd March, 2006 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition...

Prahladrai Dalmia Lions College of Commerce and Economics and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay University Act, 1974 - Sections 42, 42C and 42D

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR564

Advocate for Appellant : S.H. Kapadia, ; R.S. Pai and ; G.D. Uttangale, Advs., i/b., Ghanekar & Co. in W.P. No. 3129/86 and ; S.J. Deshmukh and ; N.M. Ganguli, Advs. in W.P.No. 159/87

S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. These two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were heard together and they can be disposed of by this common judgment. They arise out of an award/order passed...

Padubidri Damodar Shenoy Vs. Indian Airlines Limited and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services Rules - Rules 2.2, 5.32(B), 5.32(B)(1), 5.32(B)(2) and 16; Bombay Civil Service Rules - Rule 161(1) and 161(2); Employees (other than those in the Flying Crew and those in the Aircraft Engineering Departments) Service Regulations - Regulations 12 and 16

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC108; 2009(12)SCALE456; (2009)10SCC514; 2009AIRSCW5761

Advocate for Appellant : S.F. Deshmukh,; N.M. Ganguli and; P.K. Manohar, Advs

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Leave granted.2. In this appeal by special leave, interpretation and construction of Regulation 12 of Service Regulations for Employees (other than those in the Flying Crew and those in the Aircraft Engineering Departments)...

Satyawan Narayan Dewoolkar Vs. National Textile Corporation, Bombay an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR7; [1996(73)FLR1570]; (1998)IIILLJ887Bom; 1996(2)MhLj244

ChandraShekhara Das, J. 1. 1. The petitioner was a workman in Mumbai Textile Mill which has been taken over by the National Textile Corporation, the first Respondent. He challenges the order of the Industrial Court at...

Hindustan Coca Cola Bottling S/W Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Narayan Rawal ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 24, 25, 28, 30, 44, 59 and 60; Constitution of India - Articles 38, 39, 42, 43, 43-A, 142 and 226; Contract Labour (R & A) Act, 1970 - Sections 10; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1)

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR302; 2001(4)BomCR402; (2001)3BOMLR817; [2001(90)FLR150]; (2001)IILLJ502Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J.P. Cama, Adv.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The following two latest judgments of the Supreme Court have given rise to the present litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before this Court.(i) Vividh Kamgar Sabha v. Kalyani Steels...

Tata Consulting Engineers and Associates' Staff Union Vs. Tata Sons Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : 2001(4)BomCR565; [2001(90)FLR1066]; (2002)IVLLJ899Bom

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J. 1. The petitioner, a break away fraction of the parent All India Union - Tata Consultancy Employees Union has been since then, i.e., 1986, frantically trying to establish itself in the undertaking of...

Excel Wear and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31-C, 32, 39, 39(1), 41, 43, 286 and 358; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3, 25-A to 25-D, 25-F, 25-FF, 25-FFA, 25-FFA(1), 25-FFF, 25-FFF(1), 25-FFF(2), 25-K to 25-M, 25-M(3), 25-M(4), 25-N, 25-N(2), 25-O, 25-O(1) to 25-O(7), 25-P to 25-R and 30-A; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1951; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1957; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 4; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1979SC25; [1978(37)FLR314]; 1978LabIC1537; (1978)IILLJ527SC; (1978)4SCC224; [1979]1SCR1009

Advocate for Appellant : F.S. Nariman,; M.F.D. Damanis,; I. N. Shroff,;

Untwalia, J.1. By these four Writ Petitions the employers challenge the constitutional validity of Sections 25-O and 25-R of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act). The facts of the...