Advanced Search Results
In Re: Sanvijay Alloys (P.) Ltd.
Mumbai
May-06-2004
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 392, 393 and 394
2004(6)BomCR481; [2004]122CompCas754(Bom); [2004]54SCL213(Bom)
S.H. Parikh and ;Ramesh Saraogi, Advs.;S.R. Kom, Adv.
ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present Company Petition has been filed in the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of Sanvijay Alloys Pvt. Ltd. and Sanvijay Industries Pvt. Ltd., Sanvijay Steels Pvt. Ltd., with Sanvijay Rolling Engineering...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Duphar-interfran Ltd.
Mumbai
Nov-29-2000
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 394
[2001]104CompCas629(Bom)
Virendra Tulzapurkar, ;Virag Tulzapurkar and ;S.H. Parikh, Advs., i/b., Amarchand and ;Mangaldas and Suresh A. Shroff and Co.;F.E. Devitre, Adv., i/b., ;Mahimkar and Co.
K.K. Baam, J. 1. The petitioners herein Duphar-Interfran Limited have filed this petition seeking sanction to the scheme of arrangement for demerger between Duphar-Interfran Limited and Duphar Pharma India Limited. This sanction is sought as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: I.C.i.C.i. Ltd.
Mumbai
Dec-21-2001
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394
2002(4)BomCR403; [2003]115CompCas465(Bom)
R.M. Kadam and ;S.H. Parikh, Advs., i/b, Amarchand and Mangaldas Suresh A. Shroff and Company
D. G. Karnik, J.1. ICICI Ltd. (hereinafter called the 'transferor-company') which is the applicant herein has proposed a scheme of arrangement by way of amalgamation/merger into ICICI Bank Ltd. (hereinafter called as the 'transferee-company').2. By this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pennar Industries Ltd. Vs. Dynamic Logistics (P.) Ltd.
Mumbai
Mar-21-2001
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433
2001(4)ALLMR757; 2001(3)BomCR735
S.H. Parikh and ;V.V. Tulzapurkar, Advs.
Chandrachud, J.1. In pursuance of purchase orders by the respondent, a contract was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent for the construction of warehouses. The details of the 16 purchase orders have been annexed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Icici Ltd.
Mumbai
Apr-11-2002
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 393 and 394
2002(4)BomCR450
Virendra V. Tulzapurkar, ;R.M. Kadam and ;S.H. Parikh, Advs. and ;B.I. Meena, Official Liquidator;T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Council;C.J. Joy and ;M.M. Goswami, Advs. and ;R.P. Singh, Company Prosecutor;M
ORDERD.K. Deshmukh, J.1. This petition has been presented by ICICI Lid. under the provisions of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'), for the purpose of obtaining sanction of this Court to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›