Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s gundappa · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.020 seconds)

Feb 05 1958

M.C. Chikka Ramaiah and anr. Vs. Appaiah and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-05-1958

Subject : CommercialCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145, 145(4), 145(8) and 439; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1959Kant50; AIR1959Mys50; 1959CriLJ340; (1958)36MysLJ127

Advocate for Appellant : T. Krishna Rao, Adv.

ORDERK.S. Hegde, J.1. The petitioners have challenged the correctness of the order passed by the learned Special First Class Magistrate, Ramanagaram, in Criminal Mis. Case No. 1 of 1958.2. The facts of the case are as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1952

Sulegai Dodda Narayana Sa Vs. A. Hanumanthappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-26-1952

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11, 92 and 98 - Order 1, Rule 8; (Mysore) Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1927 - Sections 17 and 40

Reported in : AIR1953Kant25; AIR1953Mys25

Advocate for Appellant : S. Gundappa, Adv.

1. The property concerned in this litigation admittedly belonged to one P. R. Hanumanthappa. He is said to have left a registered will dated 22-7-1921 by which he purported to create a trust over it for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1961

H. Venkatanarayana Vs. H.R. Seshagiri Rao

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-03-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Mysore Agriculturists Relief Act - Sections 4 and 24; Mysore Agriculturists Relief (Amendment) Act, 1953

Reported in : AIR1961Kant197; AIR1961Mys197

Advocate for Appellant : S. Gundappa, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner was the defendant in the court below, and, at one stage, he was held to he not an agriculturist, as defined by the Mysore Agriculturists' Relief Act- It was the plaintiff who alleged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Dec 24 1951

Kale Gowda and ors. Vs. Marigowda and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-24-1951

Subject : FamilyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 20, 20(1) and 21; Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : AIR1952Kant107; AIR1952Mys107; ILR1952KAR331; (1953)31MysLJ14

Advocate for Appellant : S. Gundappa, Adv.

Vasudevamurthy, J. 1. The plaintiff brought a suit in the Court of the Munsiff at Hunsur for the recovery of Rs. 404/- due for principal and interest under a registered hypothecation bond dated 10-6-1926 executed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1951

V. Sampangiramaiah Vs. Government of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-1951

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 428 and 439

Reported in : AIR1952Kant53; AIR1952Mys53

Advocate for Appellant : S. Gundappa, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision petition is filed by the accused in C. C. No. 583 of 49-50 on the file of the City Magistrate, Bangalore, against the order of the learned Sessions Judge in the appeal case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1957

Devarajiah Vs. B. Padmanna

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-10-1957

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Untouchability Offences Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 4, 7 and 10; Constitution of India - Article 17; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 500; Madras Removal of Civil Disabilities Act, 1938; The Coorg Schedule Castes (Removal of Social Disabilities) Act, 1940; Government of India (Schedule Castes) Order, 1936

Reported in : AIR1958Kant84; AIR1958Mys84; (1958)36MysLJ88

Advocate for Appellant : S. Gundappa, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner has lodged a complaint with the City Magistrate, Bangalore, against the Respondent alleging that the latter had issued a printed pamphlet according to the contents of which the complainant had no right to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 1954

T. Nagappa Vs. T.C. Basappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-11-1954

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136, 191, 226, 324 and 329; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 67, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 86, 86(1), 88, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 97, 98, 99, 100(1), 102, 103, 104, 105 and 107; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 83(1), 83(2), 83(3), 90, 92, 109, 112, 113, 114, 115 and 116 - Order 6, Rule 17; Representation of People Rules - Rules 113 and 119; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 9 and 10; Election Law; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 480 and 482

Reported in : AIR1954Kant102; AIR1954Mys102

Advocate for Appellant : A.R. Somanatha Iyer and ;S. Gundappa, Advs.

Medapa, C.J.1. It will be necessary for a proper consideration of the arguments advanced in the case to set out in some detail the facts and circumstances which have led up to, and relevant for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 1955

Manasarovar Agencies Vs. Governor-general in Council, Dominion of Indi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-02-1955

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77 and 80; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 31; Mysore Railways Act - Sections 61 and 64

Reported in : AIR1955Kant123; AIR1955Mys123

Advocate for Appellant : S. Gundappa, Adv.

Padmanabhiah, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Bangalore, in Original Suit No. 24 of 1949-50 partly decreeing the suit.2. Plaintiff is a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1959

S. Melagiriyappa and ors. Vs. Lalithamma

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-11-1959

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; (Mysore) Hindu Law Women's Rights Act, 1933 - Sections 2(2), 8, 8(1), 8(5), 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 22, 22(3) and 26; Hindu Law Women's Rights (Amendment) Act, 1937

Reported in : AIR1961Kant152; AIR1961Mys152

Advocate for Appellant : S. Gundappa and ;B.V. Balaji, Advs.

1. This is an appeal by the four defendants in Original Suit No. 11 of 1953 on the file of the Court of the District Judge of Bangalore, directed against the decree passed therein for partition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1969

K.N. Marularadhya Vs. the Mysore State

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-03-1969

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Mysore Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 2(8), 2(37), 3, 4, 4(2), 6, 8, 8(1), 10, 10(1), 11, 16, 16(1), 17, 41, 49(2), 63(2), 65, 65(1), 66, 67, 72, 75, 76, 78, 82, 85, 85(1), 86, 89, 89(1), 89(2), 131, 148, 149, 149(1), 149(2), 154 and 154(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 245, 265 and 286; Madras Commercial Crops Markets Act, 1933 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4A(2), 5 and 11(1); Bombay Agricultural Produce Markerts Act, 1939 - Sections 11; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182; Mysore Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1968 - Rule 76 and 76(1); Hyderabad Agricultural Market Act, 1339-F; Mysore Agricultrual Produce Markets Act, 1939; Coorg Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1956; My

Reported in : AIR1970Kant114; AIR1970Mys114

Advocate for Appellant : Kadidal Manjappa, ;M. Rama Jois, ;V. Krishna Murthy, ;V.S. Gunjal, ;V.K. Goindarajulu, ;B.S. Keshava Iyengar, ;T. Venkanna, ;S. Gundappa, ;C.R.V. Swamy, ;G.R. Doreswamy, ;Rangaswamy, ;S.L. Benadikar,

Somnath Iyer, J.1. In these writ petitions, many common questions of law arise for decision. Those questions pertain either to the constitutionality or to the interpretation of the provisions of the Mysore Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.