Advanced Search Results

Y. Venugopala Reddy Vs. Cit

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]130TAXMAN224(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ganesh Rao, for the Assessee E.R. Indrakumar, for the Revenue

S.R. Nayak, J. The appellant is a regular income-tax assessee. His main business is that of manufacture and sale of bricks under the name and style of M/s. Nanjundeswara Bricks and Tiles, situated at Arakere Village,...

Moser Baer India Ltd. Vs. the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 4A, 92CA, 92CA(2), 92CA(3), 92CA(4) and 143(3); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 42(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 92 to 92F, 220(2A), 246A, 250(4), 271AA and 271(1); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 92; Finance Act, 2007; Assam Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 298; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 4M(1); Municipal Act - Sections 298; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rules 10A and 10B, 10D, 10E and 46A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Del)97; [2009]316ITR1(Delhi); [2009]176TAXMAN473(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv.,; Ajay Vohra,; Kavita Jha and;

Rajiv Shakdher, J.1. In the captioned writ petitions, a challenge has been laid to the orders passed by the Transfer Pricing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the 'TPO') whereby he has determined the Arm's Length Price...

Dlf Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 2 (g), 9(2), 9(4), 11

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Ganesh; Mr. Tarun Jain, Advs.

1. Does the sale of a residential building against the payment in free foreign exchange amount to service for the purposes of the grant of a Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) Certificate (duty free scrip) under...

Siel Ltd. and anr. Vs. Prime Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1), 5, 10(1), 11(6), 13(2), 16, 34 and 34(2); Societies Registration Act, 1860; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 13(2); Indian Council Arbitration Rules - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, 21B, 22 and 27

Reported in : 2008(4)ARBLR124(Delhi); 155(2008)DLT250; 2008(106)DRJ741

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. and; D.K. Malhotra and; Rajesh Malhotra

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. This common order would dispose of two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter called the Act) preferred by M/s. SIEL Ltd. and Anr. (hereafter referred to...

Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Ganesh, Mr. Rajesh Narain, Ms. Rajeshwari Shukla , Mr. Rajiv Kumar Dubey, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes 1. An order dated...

O.K. Play (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise-ii, New Delh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11A, 11A(1), 11A(2), 11A(3) and 35L; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(2) and 173G; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 - Rule 6; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 97, 97B and 110

Reported in : AIR2005SC1031; 2005(98)ECC633; 2005(180)ELT291(SC); JT2005(2)SC208; (2005)2SCC555

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv.,; Nisha Bagchi,; Meenakshi Arora,;

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. The short question which arises for determination in these civil appeals filed under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is - whether powdering of Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and High Density...

Dharam Pal Satya Pal Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Commissioner, Value Added T ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Value Added Tax

Acts : Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 - Sections 74A, 106; Constitution of India - Article 226; General Clauses Act - Section 6

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Ganesh And Ors.

1. In this batch of writ petitions, the centripetal issue that has emerged for consideration is whether the Commissioner under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (for brevity, „the DVAT Act) can exercise suo motu...

Star India Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Television

Acts : Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 - Section 20; Cinematograph Act, 1952

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Ganesh; Mr. Sidharth Chopra; Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advs.

1. Star India Private Limited („SIPL) challenges an order dated 27th November 2009, issued by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting („I&B Ministry), Government of India, administering a warning to Star Plus Channel („SPC) in exercise...

P. Nirathilingam Vs. Annaya Nadar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1980 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 7, 8, 8(3) and 12; Tamil Nadu Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938; Tamil Nadu Pawnbrokers Act, 1943; Tamil Nadu Money-Lenders Act, 1957; Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1972; Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1976; Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1979

Reported in : AIR2002SC42; I(2002)BC1(SC); JT2001(9)SC344; 2001(7)SCALE583; (2001)9SCC673

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv.(A.C.),; Mrs. Revathy Raghavan and; Ms Sw

D.P. Mohapatra, J.1. The effect of institution of a civil suit by the creditor on the proceeding initiated on the application filed by the debtor under the Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1980 (Act XIII of...

itc Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner (Ct), Guntur Division, Guntur and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(2), 14(4), 14(4-C), 20, 20(1) and 20(2)

Reported in : 2002(4)ALD324; 2002(4)ALT500

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ganesh and ;S. Suri Babu

S.R. Nayak, J.1. In both the writ petitions, the petitioner viz., M/s. ITC Limited, is the same. In both the writ petitions, the petitioner has assailed the constitutional validity of provisions of Sections 14(4-C) and 20...