Advanced Search Results

Kisan Singh Vs. State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 222(2), 225, 226, 228, 233, 234, 235, 236, 239, 324, 420, 529, 530, 535 and 537; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 409, 467 and 477-A

Reported in : AIR1961Bom124; (1960)62BOMLR921; 1961CriLJ628

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Ghate, Adv.

Mudholkar, J.1. The appellant Kishansingh who is the Sar Panch of mouza Pipri, tahsil Warora, District Chanda, has been convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chanda, for offences of Criminal breach of trust under Section 409 of...

Smt. Sarojdevi and ors. Vs. Charushil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15 and 16; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 37 and 45; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 1, 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Order 1, Rule 9

Reported in : AIR1986Bom315; 1986MhLJ745

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Ghate and ;R.R. Patel, Advs.

B.G. Deo, J.1. The short and important point for decision in this appeal is whether a suit for specific performance of a contract, abates in it's entirety when one of the plaintiffs, being a party to...

Shah Jagannath Shivlal and Another Vs. Income-tax Officer and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 277; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 256; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 256 and 362

Reported in : 1986(1)BomCR117; (1987)62CTR(Bom)177; [1987]165ITR245(Bom); 1986MhLJ292

Puranik, J.1. This revision by the accused is directed against the order passed on November 8, 1984, by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class 6th Court, Nagpur, in Criminal Case No. 839 of 1982.2. The facts leading...

Mukhtar Jafarbhai Maulana Hasanali and Others, Etc. Vs. AmiruddIn and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1986

Advocate for Appellant : P.G. Palshikar, Adv.

ORDER1. In these proceedings, the petitioners complain that the respondents by publication appeared on 9-3-1991 in daily 'Nav Bharat' at Jabalpur have shown a flagrant disregard of the order of this Court dated 6-2-1991 and thereby...

AmiruddIn and Other Vs. Mukhtar Jafarbhai Maulana Hasanali Saheb Chimt ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3898

Advocate for Appellant : Shri S.G. Aney,;Mohan Sudame and;V.C. Daga, Advs.

Dhabe, J.1. These four Contempt Appeals which arise out of the common judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court rendered on 9th April, 1991 in two contempt petitions registered as Contempt Petition No. 53...

H.N. Malak Vs. Aziz S. Yusuf

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 61, 137 and 138

Reported in : [1974]94ITR276(Bom); 1973MhLJ443

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Ghate, Adv.

Dharmadhikari, J.1. This is a revision application filed by the original plaintiff against an order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, in Civil Suit No. 97 of 1966, rejecting his application dated August 5,...

Khushal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306 and 498A

Reported in : (1989)91BOMLR801; I(1990)DMC75

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Ghate, Adv.

M.S. Ratnaparkhi, J.1. The order of conviction and sentence recorded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, on 19-12-85 in Sessions Trial No. 114/84, convicting the accused No. 1 (present appellant) for the offence punishable under Section...

J.E. Bilmoria and Sons Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 58A, 105 and 106(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Import and Export) Rules, 1968 - Rule 20

Reported in : 1990(2)BomCR108

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Ghate, Adv. in W.Ps. 1168, 1167, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173, 1174, 1175, 1176, 1296, 665 and 678 and ;S.V. Manohar, Adv. in W.Ps. 970, 971, 972 and 973

M.S. Deshpande, J.1. It would be convenient to take up together for consideration these seventeen petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, the challenge in all being to the authority of the respondents to recover excise...

Hasam Nurani Malak Vs. Mohansingh and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 55

Reported in : AIR1974Bom136; 1974MhLJ120

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Ghate, Adv. ;in A.F.O.D. No. 42 of 1965 and Shankar Anand, Adv. ;in A.F.O.D No. 43 of 1965

Chandurkar, J.1. These two cross-appeals, one filed by the defendant and the other filed by the plaintiffs arise out of a decree passed by the Civil Judge. Senior Divisons. Wardha decreeing the claim for specific performance...

Gangabisan Deokaran Gattani Vs. Talakchand Waghajibhai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949; Constitution of India - Article 227; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 111 and 114

Reported in : AIR1975Bom242; 1974MhLJ613

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Ghate, Adv.

1. This is the defendant's appeal questioning the validity of the decree in ejectment passed by the trial Court and confirmed in appeal by the District Judges, Amravati.2. To understand the submission made at the Bar,...