Advanced Search Results
Shri Ramacustam Purshottam Shirodkar, Indian National, Prematurely Ret ...
Mumbai
Jun-04-2002
Service
High Court of Bombay (Extension of Jurisdiction to Goa, Daman and Diu) Act, 1981; Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rule 10(4)
2002(6)BomCR766; (2002)3BOMLR942; 2002(4)MhLj50
S.G. Dessai, Senior Adv. and ;D.B. Ambekar, Adv.
Hardas, J.1. The petitioner, who was working as SeniorTranslator/Superintendent, by a Notice/Order which wasserved on the petitioner on 30th October 1993 wascompulsorily retired, in public interest, with immediateeffect. The Order/Notice of the High Court compulsorilyretiring the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSandip Arjun Vazarkar Vs. Scrutiny Committee for Verification of Caste ...
Mumbai
Jun-15-2009
Election
Mazania Act; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes, (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificates Act, 2000; Goa Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 7 and 16; Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 - Sections 7 and 10; Evidence Act - Sections 101 to 104; Representation of the People Act - Sections 81(1), 81(3), 86 and 114; Goa Panchayat and Zilla Panchayats Rules, 1996; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226, 243D(6) and 243F(1)
2009(111)BomLR2371
S.G. Dessai, Sr. Adv. and ;Shivan Dessai, Adv.
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. On 17.4.2009, the learned Senior Advocates, as also the government Advocate appearing for the parties have pointed out that as per Orders of this Court dated 11.2.2009, the matter is to be disposed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmol Alias Amolkumar Gajanan Naik Vs. Director of Municipal Administra ...
Mumbai
May-12-1987
Election
Goa, Daman and Diu Municipalities Act, 1968 - Sections 46(1), 46(3) and 46(4)
1987(3)BomCR721
S.G. Dessai and ;R.V. Kamat, Advs.
G.D. Kamat, J.1. This petition bring to the fore section 46(c) of the Goa, Damn and Diu Municipalities Act, 1968 for short 'the Act'. That section reads :---'46. Disqualification of Councillor during his term of office.---(1)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Francis Milton KevIn Noronha Alias Francis Noronha Vs. Aloma Ana ...
Mumbai
Feb-20-2008
Family
Divorce Law - Article 4(4); Family Laws - Article 24; Constitution of India - Article 227; Civil Code, 1867 - Schedule - Articles 171 and 178
2008(5)BomCR218; 2008(2)MhLj805
S.G. Dessai, Sr. Adv. and ;Shivan Dessai, Adv.
N.A. Britto, J.1. Challenge in this petition is to the Order dated 6-1-2007 of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mapusa, by which the son of the Petitioner and the Respondent has been granted maintenance of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmarjit Singh Cheema Vs. State Through Public Prosecutor
Mumbai
Jun-23-1987
CriminalNarcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3
1988(1)BomCR108
S.G. Dessai, Adv.
G.D. Kamat, J.1. The appellant has been convicted by the judgment and order dated 11th of March, 1987, in Sessions Case No. 67 of 86, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji, under section 20(b)(ii) of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhalchandra G. Naik Vs. Suresh Melvani and Another
Mumbai
Nov-27-1998
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 173(4), 200, 204, 397, 401, 482 and 483
2000(5)BomCR221; 2000BomCR(Cri)221; 1999CriLJ1908
S.G. Dessai, ;S.A. and ;Ms. S. Kamat, Adv.
ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. The petitioner is seeking to challenge the Order dated 13-7-1998 passed in Criminal Revision Application No. 29 of1998 by the Sessions Judge at Panaji. The learned Sessions Judge has, by the impugned order,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBandekar Brothers Private Limited, a Private Limited Company Incorpora ...
Mumbai
Mar-11-2002
Property
Land Acquisition Act - Sections 3, 4, 5A, 6, 38, 44A, 44B and 55; Town and Country Planning Act - Sections 41; Evidence Act - Sections 83; Goa Panchayatraj Act - Sections 65; Goa Land Revenue Code - Sections 14, 110, 112 and 115; Goa, Daman and Diu Land Acquisition Rules, 1972 - Rule 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3) and 4(4); Goa (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage of Minerals) Rules, 2004 - Rule 3; Land Acquisition (Companies) Rules, 1963 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 226
2009(111)BomLR3475
S.G. Dessai, Sr. Adv. and ;Shivan Dessai, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 511 of 2007 and ;A.D. Bhobe, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 542 of 2007
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners-landowners question acquisition of their lands for the purposes of construction of a road leading to jetty of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaruti Krishanji Chavan Vs. Harish Chandra Satarkar
Mumbai
Mar-17-1992
Motor Vehicles
1993ACJ1200
S.G. Dessai, Adv.
G.D. Kamat, J.1. This revision application is directed against the order, dated 28th January, 1991, whereby the prayer made by the petitioner to exclude the compensation of Rs. 7,500/- paid under Section 92-A of the Motor...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Sangli Bank Limited Vs. M/S. Timblo Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Mumbai
Aug-06-1999
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 115 - Order 20, Rule 11 - Order 21, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 23, Rules 3 and 4; Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 - Rule 19; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 62 and 63; Companies Act, 1956
AIR2000Bom195; 2000(2)BomCR106
S.G. Dessai, Sr.A. and ;A.B. D'Sa, Advs.
ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Common questions of fact and law arise inboth the revision applications and therefore the same were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. These revision applications arise from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Victor Albuquerque Vs. Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Others
Mumbai
Jan-07-1998
LimitationCivil
Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
1998(3)ALLMR393; 1998(3)BomCR93
S.G. Dessai, S.A. and ;D. Pangam, Adv.
ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 182 days in filing an appeal against the order dated 15th March 1997 passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panaji in Civil Misc. Application...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »