Advanced Search Results
Babu Bhai and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-09-1997
Criminal
Calcutta Police Act, 1866 - Sections 50A; Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 12 and 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482
1998CriLJ565
S.D. Vyas, Adv.
ORDERP.C. Jain, J. 1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482, Cr. P.C. for quashing FIR No. 167 of 1997 dated 1-7-1997 of Police Station, Jalore, by which, a case under Section 13 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPata Ram Bheel Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Oct-20-2004
Constitution
Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 - Sections 9, 11, 13 and 14; Rajasthan Municipalities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2004 - Sections 2 and 9(1A); Constitution of India - Article 243P
RLW2005(1)Raj415; 2005(1)WLC322
S.D. Vyas,; P.S. Bhati,; Chaitanya Gahlot,;
N.N. Mathur, J.1. This group of writ petitions has been filed before issuance of the notification for municipal elections seeking direction to- postpone the process of election pointing- out serious defects in delimitation of wards, arbitrary...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirish Pal Singh and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
Sep-08-2004
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B
2005CriLJ279; RLW2005(1)Raj340; 2004(4)WLC692
S.D. Vyas, Adv.
ORDERN.N. Mathur, J.In this group of Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C, petitioners have sought direction to quash different F.I.Rs. lodged at Anti Corruption Bureau Choki Sirohi, Police Station Pradhan Aarakshi Kendra, Anti Corruption...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R.K. Das Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Oct-11-2000
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2001Raj74; 2001(1)WLC227; 2001(1)WLN400
M. Mridul, Sr. Adv.,; S.N. Trivedi and; S.D. Vyas, A
Shethna, J.1. Shri R.K. Das Gupta, President, Bikaner Bar Association addressed a letter dated 15-3-2000 to Hon'ble Justice Shri N.N. Mathur, Judge, Rajasthan High Court for making available the land of Farras Khana owned by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBheekha Ram Vs. Goma Devi and ors.
Rajasthan
Jan-22-1999
FamilyCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125
I(2000)DMC76; 1999WLC(Raj)UC260
S.D. Vyas, Adv.
ORDERG.L. Gupta, J.1. This revision by the husband has been preferred against the revisional order dated 17.3.1997 passed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Addl. Sessions Judge, Bikaner where he set aside the order dated 22.4.1995 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMst. Hangami Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Oct-19-1983
Criminal
1984WLN(UC)47
Mr. Vyas
M.C. Jain, J.1. The appellant Mst. Hangami was prosecuted for the offence under Section 302, IPC, for having murdered her husband Heera on the night intervening 1-11-1976 and 2-11 1976 at his house situated at village...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankaria Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jul-10-1986
Criminal
1986WLN(UC)452
Sobhag Mal Jain, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25th May, 1981, of the Sessions Judge, Balotra, convicting and sentencing the accused for the offence under Section 326 IPC to one year's rigorous...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurli Manohar Arora Vs. State and ors
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Jan-02-2013
Education
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER Murli Manohar Arora Versus State of Rajasthan S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 2389/2012 Date of Order:2. 1.2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt.Manju Devi Vs. State
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Feb-12-2013
Education
S.B. CRL. MISC. 5th BAIL APPLN. NO. 9726/2012. Smt. Manju Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan (Alongwith one connected matter) // 1 // 15 S.B. CRL. MISC. 5th BAIL APPLN. NO. 9726/2012. Smt. Manju Devi Vs. State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Khumana Ram and ors.
Rajasthan
Jul-24-1997
Civil
1997(2)WLN115
R.R. Yadav, J.1. In the aforesaid three revisions common questions of law and facts are involved therefore, it would be expedient to dispose them of by a composite order.2. Heard.3 Perused the order passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »